User talk:Jackin the box

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Thanks for your suggestions!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 14:24, January 17, 2022 (EST)

Re: Vaccine

You need to stop making edits in the Vaccine article that continually attempt to force a liberal/pro-CCP flu "vaccine"/not legitimately sourced viewpoint on it. Northwest (talk) 11:17, February 20, 2022 (EST)

What rubbish Northwest. See my comments at Talk:Vaccine#Recent reverts. I'm not a liberal, by the way. To repeat, my edits were based on reliable sources, and included much supported by other pages on Conservapedia, —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jackin the box (talk)
Yet the edits you made were pro-CCP flu "vaccines", which is supported by liberals based squarely on politics, ideology and pseudo-science (and thus makes those edits pushing of a liberal POV). Northwest (talk) 11:46, February 20, 2022 (EST)
You made mention of edit warring in your latest edit summary - but that was edit warring which you started for the sake of imposing a liberal/pro CCP flu "vaccine" POV. Next POV edit you make, you get blocked for a day. Northwest (talk) 13:09, February 20, 2022 (EST)
Proposal: Place alternative language on the talk language for discussion and vetting before editing mainspace. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 13:15, February 20, 2022 (EST)

Thanks RobS. I remain puzzled what questions relating to a poorly written sentence have to do with politics. Furthermore my comments about Conservapedia articles backing my POV have been ignored by Northwest. But I'm tired of repeating myself and enjoy editing not arguing. --Jackin the box (talk) 13:33, February 20, 2022 (EST)

Well, the politization of science needs its own article, and vaccines certainly could or would be discussed there. Right now we need factual information for vaccines. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 13:47, February 20, 2022 (EST)

Re: CCP virus in Canada

All your edits in the CCP virus in Canada article were reverted because you included sources from liberal media websites such as CBC, CTV and CP24 - all of which are among the last sites that would be trusted (particularly including the CBC, Justin Trudeau's state mouthpiece) to tell the truth about anything to do with the CCP flu scamdemic. Northwest (talk) 17:45, April 12, 2022 (EDT)

I have found conservative sources for the edits that you, Northwest, reverted. You might have been more helpful? Also both Canadian province, that I edited, have conservative governments. Hope that you realize that Canadian provinces are not the under Trudeau's thumb! --Jackin the box (talk) 20:44, April 12, 2022 (EDT)
Your latest edits were reverted because:
  • One, Global News is part of the liberal media, not "conservative", so it is not a reliable source;
  • Two, you misquoted the Rebel News source, as Ontario public health officer Kieran Moore is lying about the figures he has claimed; also, the New Brunswick and Ontario "conservative" governments are both being led by premiers (Blaine Higgs and Doug Ford, respectively) who campaigned as "conservatives" but came out as liberals the moment the CCP flu scamdemic became a thing. You need to stop putting false information in that article - and you also need to watch where you're going regarding "ivory towers". Northwest (talk) 21:54, April 13, 2022 (EDT)
Baed on these arguments there appears to be very few "real" conservatives. --Jackin the box (talk) 12:00, April 15, 2022 (EDT)

Re: Your edits

Your edits in the CCP virus in Canada and Ketanji Brown Jackson articles have been reverted because:

  • In the case of the CCP virus in Canada article, you were re-adding information and a reflink that is already explained at the bottom of the Ontario section (and news items go in chronological order, with the most recent news items added at the bottom of each section).
  • In the Ketanji Brown Jackson article, Frank Robert James' support for Jackson is completely relevant to the article and is not "trivial", so the removal of the information about that is not warranted; also, Andy Ngo is a conservative journalist, not liberal, so there is no liberal POV like you falsely claim (conversely, with your edits, you yourself are trying to force a liberal POV).

Please stop making such edits. Northwest (talk) 17:10, April 15, 2022 (EDT)

Re Judge Jackson, your argument makes no sense. Liberal POV really: I see the opposite, with regard to the content (a terrorist hates the judge), while adding irrelevant trivia trivializes Conservapedia and defeats its ideological; aims!!!
Re covid in Ontario, my apologies, though wouldn't it be better to have the latest news at the top? I wonder how many people read more than a line or two of this overcrowded article. Someone should try and make it more concise and reader-friendly. --Jackin the box (talk) 17:27, April 15, 2022 (EDT)
Okay, so James is disappointed about Jackson being in an interracial marriage, but it doesn't mean that he doesn't otherwise support her installation to the SCOTUS by the Biden regime. In any event, the next time you revert that article to the edit you want (contrary to what you're told not to do), you get blocked. Northwest (talk) 19:52, April 15, 2022 (EDT)
So you own the article? Why this unfriendly attitude? We need at least one more person to settle this matter. --Jackin the box (talk) 10:16, April 16, 2022 (EDT)--Jackin the box (talk) 10:16, April 16, 2022 (EDT)


Making personal comments about family members is little different than doxxing. Please refrain from that conduct in the future. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 20:47, April 21, 2022 (EDT)

Dear Rob Smith, I have never made any abusive comments about anyone's family, so you must have confused me with another editor.
My humble apologies, sincerely. I did get certain user names confused. Again, sorry. Feel free to remove this thread, or I can do it, with your permission (so as to preserve the record of my mistake and retraction). RobSLet's Go Brandon! 15:37, April 22, 2022 (EDT)

That's appreciated. Thanks. --Jackin the box (talk) 15:59, April 22, 2022 (EDT)


Im sorry? but that is the truth about women and replacers. They dont care about the age of consent. They are liberals and leftists at a far higher rate than the White Men. RussiaFTW (talk) 16:50, May 26, 2022 (EDT)

RussiaFTW: Your use of bigoted stereotypes make you look like a liberal or leftist. RobSZ 19:09, May 26, 2022 (EDT)

Re: Apology

I read what you posted in your edit summary in the Socialism article - "When you understand history better you can use the word liberal"

Based on the edits you've made in that article, you're demonstrating that you yourself are the one who does not understand history regarding the Nazis or where on the political spectrum they belong (both Hitler and Goebbels, in fact, admitted that the Nazis were part of the Left):

7 Quotes That Prove Adolf Hitler Was A Proud Socialist

Joseph Goebbels: "The NSDAP (Nazi Party) is the German Left. We despise bourgeois nationalism" - published in Der Angriff, December 6, 1931

National Socialism (Nazism) was Socialist

Nazis & Communists: Ideological Bedfellows

Fascism Is Far Left, Not Far Right on Political Spectrum

And if you claim that the Nazis are "far-Right" as liberals love to falsely claim, then why are liberal politicians such as the Biden regime, as well as Justin Trudeau's regime in Canada, supporting the neo-Nazi regime in the Ukraine? That's another indicator that the Nazis are really part of the far-Left.

So in other words, when I said you were going out of you way to impose a liberal POV in your edits (and not just in the Socialism article either), I meant what I said. Northwest (talk) 20:34, May 26, 2022 (EDT)

Thanks, Northwest, I find this left right business very confusing. Only here have I ever heard Nazis described as leftists. They hated communism, surely? Again, I always thought that fascists were the opposite of communist, yet here liberals are socialist (who are communists), are fascists, are democrats. Equally confusing is the support by the right of Russia, and of former KGB officer, and communist Putin. I'm sorry but this is very confusing to this OAP. --Jackin the box (talk) 21:08, May 26, 2022 (EDT)

PS The Encyclopaedia Britannicadoes states: "Liberals, socialists, and communists remained bitterly opposed to Hitler" and "On April 7, 1933, Nazis began to purge the civil service, along with the universities, of communists, socialists, democrats, and Jews". So it appears that I'm not entirely out of my mind. I'm going to garden – to hell with politics!!!!--Jackin the box (talk) 21:08, May 26, 2022 (EDT)

Democratic states on one side and totalitarian on the other make more sense to me, than this confusing left and right stuff. --Jackin the box (talk) 21:25, May 26, 2022 (EDT)
The problem we have today is the Ukrainian Right Sector. Joe Biden, Lloyd Austin, Jake Sullivan, Victoria Nuland, NATO, et al support the Right Sector. If you can help out a bit resolving this problem, I personally might be willing to give some ground in this debate. RobSZ 21:36, May 26, 2022 (EDT)
And no, the last Ukrainian Nazi did not die or surrender at Azovstal; a Right Sector Nazi is the Speaker of the Ukrainian Parliament who just got $40 billion in your cash to spend. So let's focus on first-things-first, then we can get involved in a more obscure, historical, theoretical debate. RobSZ 21:39, May 26, 2022 (EDT)
"Without the Right Sector, the Revolution of Dignity would have been a gay parade." RobSZ 21:42, May 26, 2022 (EDT)