You have previously been asked to make substantiative contributions here, as opposed to merely arguing for politically correct, world-view nonsense. You are failing to do so. There will not be further warnings, appeals or reprieves, just to be perfectly clear. You have too good a mind to be so clouded by clearly moronic liberal ideology. --₮K/Admin/Talk 18:11, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
- TK, please would you be kind enough to explain which of my edit are "politically correct, world-view nonsense". I'm aiming to make CP trustworthy, as it claims in its masthead, which at a minimum means factually accurate. JosephMac 18:30, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
- "Factually accurate", JosephMac, does not include a liberal POV. Wikipedia also says its articles are "factually accurate", but it is a truism they are not, being so riddled with liberal bias and ideology as they are. You should open your mind and try to discern the truth, rise above the indoctrination you have obviously been the recipient of. It will indeed set you free. --₮K/Admin/Talk 18:39, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
Sweeping claims based on "authorities" are disfavored here, and I'm inclined to revert the statements disavowing Pauline authorship of certain Epistles unless others demonstrate why that disavowal should remain.--Andy Schlafly 20:51, 6 December 2009 (EST)
Your edits don't seem to be advancing our goals here. Consider yourself on probation from here on. Your user name will appear in red on Special:Recent changes as a reminder to other admins.
- Let me see... A whole chapter of the Bible translated, two short books of the Bible proof-read... That's not advancing CP's goals???
- A writing plan for a wiki is: (1) Find a page I'm interested in. (2) Edit it. (3) Let other people edit my edits. (4) Respond to their edits if I don't think they're improvements. (5) Iterate 2, 3 and 4 till we're all happy. JosephMac 15:57, 30 December 2009 (EST)