User talk:Leibniz

Thanks for contributing, however please don't put opinion in articles without sourcing it. Geo. 19:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Your entry on my talk page

Your entry on my talk page is a unacceptable insult. "This user is a known radical Islamic sympathizer.

Edits by this user on religious articles should be taken with little credibility."

• First: I am not radical
• Second: I am not sypathising with Islam
• Third: "This user is known" implies that there is a proof for this lies

An isult like this is not aceptable at all. This insult is able to discredit my name and my person. It is against the rules of conservapedia and it is against the law. If you do not stop insults like this, I may consider taking legal actions. --Bodenseemann 14:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

I guess that your lying isult is based on my revert to your edit in Islam. I deleted the word "false" from "Islam is a false monotheistic religion... " as it is a believe and no one can judge if any believe is wrong or false. Doing so is radical and fanatic, what is not acceptable in any case. Radicalism and fanatism has to be fought. And it does not matter if it is islamic, comunistic, liberal, conservative or christian. Radicalism and fanatism was and is the base of terrorism and of hatered. Hatered as can be seen in the insulting lie you were telling about me. --Bodenseemann 14:34, 15 March 2007 (EDT)