User talk:MikeR

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links

Welcome!

Hello, MikeR, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, MikeR!


Croeso, Meic! Bugler 17:56, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

Many thanks, Bugler :) MikeR 19:29, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

Libellous accusations

Do you think it clever to try and spread malicious lies about me? Have your 'friends' sent you here to do that, and to try and disrupt this work? If you believe it to be true, then I suggest you communicate your beliefs to Mr Schlafly, or to senior sysops, and good luck to you. Bugler 05:16, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

Reversion

Keep the comments on Talk:PNAS Response to Letter substantive, don't claim special expertise for yourself, and avoid personal attacks ... or it will unfortunately become necessary to block your account.--Aschlafly 09:31, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

Of course, if one claims to have reviewed scientific or engineering papers in the past, then that seems to be OK, at least for some editors.--Argon 14:26, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
Thanks Argon. I'm lost... I didn't feel my comment was an attack at all, just constructive criticism. It's very clear to me that a number of the claims being made are simply wrong, and that those pursuing this should try and bring on board somebody with expert knowledge to try and create a more solid argument. Numerous Conservapedia editors have pointed this out, yet those of us who believe that the letter to PNAS was anything less than 100% perfect have our comments deleted, and get threatened with bans. It's not like I've made any trouble here whatsoever. I joined a month or two ago, I've quietly made a number of contributions for which I've had no acknowledgment (nor asked for it), yet when I dare voice my opinion on a talk page specifically created to discuss the PNAS response, I get threatened with a ban... MikeR 20:47, 15 September 2008 (EDT)