User talk:NSmyth

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

User Complaints

I think 1 week is a little weak considering the massive amounts of vandalism done by Liberatarian. ColinR 06:45, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I didn;t see it, I\\\'m probably going to expand it shortly.NSmyth 06:47, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Take a look at the past 100 changes or so. I\\\'m just glad a sysop showed up and blocked him. Users Sam, Jpaffett, and Bmn2008 were all vandalizing earlier too. I tried to mark each time they vandalized in the summary of changes. Thanks! ColinR 06:49, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I\\\'ll reblock him when the week is up, he\\\'ll probably have forgotten about the site by then anyway. .NSmyth 06:50, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks for your blocks. For obscenity or clear vandals, I suggest blocks of infinite duration. We don't want those folks returning. Someone will tell us if we made a mistake and we can then undo an infinite block. But such mistakes are less than 1%. Thanks much.--Aschlafly 18:31, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

User:Ilove69 is a vandal.

I\\\'m just sitting here patiently waiting for him to come back with a new account. But the infinite ban might just stick. NSmyth 07:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

  • lol that comment was the only reason i made those last 4 accounts. anyway as i said before, i\'m done, so i guess you\'re right the infinite ban will stick. I\'d love to find a way to do some serious mass vandalism, but yeah you\'ve got it locked down fairly well - i was actualy impressed with your response time on that last one! you got me before the minute was out! nice work Kfactor 09:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Sam is a vandal also. He keeps trying to edit the censorship page. ColinR 07:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

If you\\\'re still online, Darrenissa is a vandal also. See Rudy Giuliani and NATO pages for explanation. ColinR 07:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I saw that and have put a warning on her page.


Hey man i\'m your vandal:

  • Libertarian
  • ilove69
  • Water_cracker
  • Planner
  • Teratactile
  • lesbian sex lover

But yeah game over man. Good luck in the future - I reckon due to the nature of the website you\'ll end up receiving way more vandalism than i could ever hope to dish out - and possibly not in the light hearted manner of my edits, but serious bot based vandalism. .I\'ll look into it. Kfactor 09:06, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

I understand... but

I understand your frustration and removal of the post that was placed on the Conservapedia Talk page. However, it was perfectly acceptable. I have restored it. If something is posted on a talk page it should really only be deleted if it violates the Commandments. Thanks Conservapedia Webmaster 09:29, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Yeah, I was about leave you a comment about that after I saw that you had changed it back. I didn't look at where I was before I wiped it. I thought it was another part of the spam attack I've been dealing with. My mistake, sorry. NSmyth 09:32, 13 March 2007 (EDT)


For catching that idiot vandal on the Rudy page! When it happens, please post your actions on the talk page there, so we can all know whats been happening, ok? --TK 03:28, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

A Liberal Editor?

Because I am so amazingly awsome I feel i should get my own area so I have taken the liberty of making one. Speaking of Liberty, I'm surprised that there's a liberal sysop on this site. Wouldn't joining something like conservapedia go against what you believe in? I mean after all, you're liberal, you should hate everything conservatives stand for. I think you're just a hypocrit, you say you're one thing but side with the other, how can anyone respect you? You can even stay true to your political beliefs, you're a traitor and you should be despised. Something like this would be considered treason and do you know what they used to do to people who committed treason? They would be executed... maybe we should adopt this into our times

I am a socialist, I actually have spent a good portion of my time removing bias(for either side) from pages and even more(almost all of it actually) time fighting the vandalism that goes on here. I don't know if you're one of those vandals or if you actually plan on making a difference here. I'm just here to help keep things factual.NSmyth01:18, 21 March 2007 (EDT) P.S. I changed the name of this to something a touch more intelligent.
I can see why your here and that's all fine, but what would draw you to a conservative site to begin with? There is something wrong with that picture, I could understand if it was wikipedia or something like that but conservapedia? You can do better than that i'm sure. I lean more towards anarchy than anything but I have nothing else better to do. Good luck keeping things factual and dealing with vandals, I'm not here to vandalise anything, just here to challenge people's opinions and see if they can truly back up what they believe. Once again good luck...


If you want the truth(I mean, I base my existence on this site on it) I originally came here intending to be a vandal, but found that I could do good and make this a viable site unlike others. Please voice your opinions, just don't post them in the articles and it's all good. Post your opinions on the discussion pages and we won't have a problem.Nsmyth01:27, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for helping me out when I was blocked, much appreciated


No problem.NSmyth

You hate cheese!

I gobble cheese. Why do you hate it. --Lohengrin 03:25, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

God bless you for that block!

Thank you for that quick block at 4 am NYC time of the user who gave himself the name of JEWS DID WTC. LOL JEWS. LOL WTC. !!!!!--Aschlafly 09:19, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks. I just happened to click the recent changes link and it was at the top of the list.NSmyth 09:21, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for acting quickly on what you saw!--Aschlafly 09:28, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks again, also fixed "TheTruth"

Thanks again for your great blocks. I've de-Sysoped TheTruth after seeing your discussion about it and recalling that you have replaced the account. Thanks.--Aschlafly 10:01, 23 March 2007 (EDT)


Kiowa was subtly vandalizing articles and changing facts to make them blatantly wrong. I found about five examples of it going back through his edits. For example, look at his edit on Americium.

Tmtoulouse was openly encouraging people to vandalize articles. MountainDew 04:05, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

Ok, was just curious...*laughs at americium edit*. Thanks for clearing that up for me.NSmyth 04:07, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

If you like

Enjoy the use of this template if you like {{liberal}}. I was going to turn it into a six pointed star but I thought that would be too much. Myk 08:51, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

I honestly have no idea what to think of this lol.NSmyth 08:54, 27 March 2007 (EDT)


Please enhance our entry on Nirvana. The article shows promise, but needs a good deal of work. Thank you for your attention in this matter. --Huey gunna getcha 16:29, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

Unfortunately I don't know much about the subject.I cna try to find something on Google though I guess.Nsmyth


How exactly are shellfish an abomination?NSmyth 16:26, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

Because God says so:
"Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you." (Leviticus 11:12)
Shellfish are in the waters and have neither fins nor scales.
Is that clear enough?
"He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he." (Deuteronomy 32:4)
BillyBoy 06:27, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
  • Somewhere in all of that, The New, and Everlasting Covenant seems to be missing......--~ TerryK MyTalk 06:51, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Sysop Pledge

As my good deed of the day I am requesting that you place this template on your userpage. Participating sysops will earn my respect and gratitude. --BenjaminS 00:03, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Ok, Considering it makes sense and I don't believe I've gone agaisnt it yet, I have absolutely no problem putting it on my userpage.NSmyth 07:50, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
Sysop Pledge
As a Conservapedia Sysop, I will NEVER ARBITRARILY block anyone who is not in violation of the Conservapedia Commandments or related CP Guidelines.


Just a note of thanks to you, NSmyth, for your past efforts. As a matter of policy, we de-Sysop inactive or semi-retired users. Sysop status can be reconsidered at a future time.

Thanks again and God bless your future efforts.--Aschlafly 18:57, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

You're welcome. It was a pleasure to work with you and others here. I might be back when I can afford to have my internet turned back on(Gets turned off tomorrow). I might check up on the site whenever I have access to an internet equipped computer. Nsmyth 19:20, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
  • I agree with Andy. Please come back when you can. You are a fair person. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 20:31, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

Welcome back...

I emailed Andy my support for restoring you to Sysop. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 12:28, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

Thank you. It's good to be back. Thanks for the support.NSmyth 14:40, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

Block privileges given

You have been given the ability to block users. Thanks! CPWebmaster 21:45, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

  • Bless you, Philip! U have google mail, dude. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 21:48, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

Welcome back

Welcome back. It's been awhile. DanH 21:24, 17 February 2008 (EST)

Welcome back indeed. I hope you've been well.--Aschlafly 21:31, 17 February 2008 (EST)

Thank you! Yes it has been a while, I've been really busy with other stuff for a while. I'm still busy a lot of the time so I won't be around too too much, but I'll actually be around now. I've been quite well, I'm actually about to go back to school to get my HS diploma and will hopefully be going to college to be a chef afterwards. Thanks again for the warm welcome, sorry it took so long to come back again and read it :( --NSmyth 01:28, 20 February 2008 (EST)