View source for Talk:Essay: China's decline and some Roman Empire decline parallels

If anyone takes issue with this essay, please feel free to create a counter essay at: [[Essay: China is NOT in decline, but even if it is, it will NEVER collapse]]. Godspeed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:34, January 5, 2025 (EST)

See also [[Essay: Are ignorance, stubbornness, and stupidity conservative values?]]

[[File:China sewage eating.PNG|800px]]

You're just a sick puppy. [https://www.bing.com/search?q=idiom%3A%20sick%20puppy%3F&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&lq=0&pq=idiom%3A%20sick%20puppy%3F&sc=0-18&sk=&cvid=F1B8CC6E725540D1BEA89154F09DCEEF&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl=][https://crossidiomas.com/sick-puppy/][https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/Sick+Puppy]

=More faulty [[crap]], i.e. [[fraud]]ulent research=

[[User:Conservative]] asked [[AI]], "[https://www.google.com/search?q=what+are+the+similarities+of+decline+of+China+and+decline+of+roman+empire&oq=what+are+the+similarities+of+decline+of+China+and+decline+of+roman+empire&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQLhhA0gEJMjYxMzRqMGoxqAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 what are the similarities of decline of China and decline of roman empire]" for which he received answers to the [[Han Dynasty]], which disappeared 2 millennia ago and the answers he tries to pass off as related to modern [[China]].

Andy, you need to do something about this deliberate, [[deceptive]], [[malicious trolling]] [[User:Conservative]] is engaged in, where he fills up Mainspace Categories with errant and fraudulent material to inhibit and dissuade other editors from adding any more content to those Categories. 

Essays do not belong in Mainspace Categories where other editors are not allowed to correct errors (whether accidental or willful). It hinders the growth of the community and content. Essays are the opinion of one person and Mainspace Categories are for collaborative or collective editing.

Furthermore, when asked to remove the Essay from a Category because of questionable or controversial content, the Essay writer should show [[civility]] and a cooperative spirit to comply until such a time as corrections or changes can be made. This same editor has just removed tens of thousands of bytes of his errant and questionable content. It should not take years to get action on a simple request to fix these errors. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:40, March 31, 2025 (EDT)

===What a farce and joke this is===
For the sake of brevity, I'll be brief: Nowhere does Google AI say Roman elite fled the empire. Where were they going to flee to, barbarian lands? It says they fled to the countryside or other parts and provinces of the empire. See for yourself.

[[User:Conservative]] lacks [[questioning skills]] in producing all this [[AI]] content.

==="Chinese elite fleeing to the USA"===
Now we have the problem of defining "elite". Presumably, the author has "elite" confused with "[[scientist]]" & "[[technocrat]]". In the [[European Union]], "elite" or "[[elitism]]" refers to the political ruling class, a definition closely shared with [[North American]] "elites". [[Oligarch]]s who own the political "elite" ruling class and [[bureaucrat]]s are also lumped into this same category.

In China, the ruling elite is the CCP, and those [[oligarch]]s outside the CCP only exist by their cooperation and favoritism with the CCP. Perhaps the author means "elite scientist, academics, and technicians", a distinction not generally shared in [[the West]] (it's all about money, honey, not brains or skill).

Yes, there are corrupt members of the elite ruling CCP with foreign Swiss bank accounts, but according to the Congressional Research Service, those are just rainy day funds for if and when the big collapse comes.

What's more, for every one American college grad in science or law, there are five Chinese grads. And they certainly are not fleeing to the [[US]], whether legally or illegal, to upset those numbers (the so-called "brain drain").

IMO, this just another example of the authors [[naivety]] and lack of knowledge about the subject he's writing on, seasoned up by his [[Sinophobia]] and confusion of [[American]] [[patriotism]] with [[bigotry]]. Nothing new here. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:08, March 31, 2025 (EDT)

==Trump now boasts and takes credit for saving Chinese Communists from civil unrest==
[[File:Trump 5-30-25.PNG|center|650px|thumb|]]
You're batting about 0-5 in just the past 36 hrs. There is no point in reporting or recording this information since it conflicts and is confusing with the millions of bytes of [[spam]] [[trolling]] you have uploaded over the past 3 years.

You trolling has limited [[Conservapedia]] content creation going forward, filled Conservapedia with erroneous and bigoted information. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:22, May 30, 2025 (EDT)

===[https://karlof1.substack.com/p/chinas-tech-attracts-international China's Tech Attracts International Capital]===
[[User:Conservative proven wrong]], again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 19:11, December 16, 2025 (EST)

==[[User:Conservative proven wrong]], [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Conservative_proven_wrong AGAIN]==
*[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/04/china-surpasses-us-in-research-spending-the-consequences-extend-far-beyond-scientific-ranking-and-clout.html China Surpasses US in Research Spending – The Consequences Extend Far Beyond Scientific Ranking and Clout].