Difference between revisions of "Template:Scientific opinion gould"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(category template quotes)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"The quality of a scientific approach or opinion depends on the strength of its factual premises and on the depth and consistency of its reasoning, not on its appearance in a particular journal or on its popularity among other scientists." [http://www.discovery.org/a/18301]
 
"The quality of a scientific approach or opinion depends on the strength of its factual premises and on the depth and consistency of its reasoning, not on its appearance in a particular journal or on its popularity among other scientists." [http://www.discovery.org/a/18301]
 +
<noinclude>
 +
[[Category:Template quotes]]
 +
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 16:47, September 7, 2012

"The quality of a scientific approach or opinion depends on the strength of its factual premises and on the depth and consistency of its reasoning, not on its appearance in a particular journal or on its popularity among other scientists." [1]