Difference between revisions of "Talk:EvoWiki"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
(Poor Horace...) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Hypocrisy reigns supreme. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 22:29, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | Hypocrisy reigns supreme. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 22:29, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
:::Horace, I suggest you take this up with the [[User:CPanel|Conservapedia Panel]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:15, 20 September 2012 (EDT) | :::Horace, I suggest you take this up with the [[User:CPanel|Conservapedia Panel]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:15, 20 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Horace was exiled years ago (as you well know) so you are talking to someone who can't reply (as you well know) - and the CP Panel has not answered its phone for a similar length of time (as you well know,) so, even if he could reply, it wouldn't do him any good (as you well know.) You have outdone yourself on this one. Well done! [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 02:37, 20 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
== ScientificAustralian's reversion == | == ScientificAustralian's reversion == | ||
Revision as of 06:37, September 20, 2012
Pot calls kettle black
The article states:
- "EvoWiki is an evolutionist website that claims to be free, but only allows pro-evolution edits".
Have you noticed, by any chance, that the "Theory of Evolution" page at Conservapedia is locked? And that it is actually an "Anti-Theory of Evolution" page?
Hypocrisy reigns supreme. --Horace 22:29, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- Horace, I suggest you take this up with the Conservapedia Panel Conservative 02:15, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
Horace was exiled years ago (as you well know) so you are talking to someone who can't reply (as you well know) - and the CP Panel has not answered its phone for a similar length of time (as you well know,) so, even if he could reply, it wouldn't do him any good (as you well know.) You have outdone yourself on this one. Well done! AlanE 02:37, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
ScientificAustralian's reversion
ScientificAustralian just reverted my previous edit, with the comment, "why put stuff about creation wiki on the evo wiki page".
To answer that question, because CreationWiki's responses to EvoWiki's claims are relevant to an article about EvoWiki.
And I would ask a question in return: Why revert my entire edit simply because you disagree with one part of it?
Philip J. Rayment 22:19, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
- Philip J. Rayment, I added the CreationWiki material for you. Conservative 02:13, 20 September 2012 (EDT)