Difference between revisions of "Tools of censorship"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Chipshandon09 (Talk) to last version by WesleyS) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* claiming that the Constitution requires a wall of separation of church and state to exclude anything religious from schools | * claiming that the Constitution requires a wall of separation of church and state to exclude anything religious from schools | ||
* excessive name-calling in order to bully the other side into silence | * excessive name-calling in order to bully the other side into silence | ||
| + | * boycotts of businesses, such as Chick-Fil-A, that don't follow the their agenda | ||
| + | * cherry-picking to present only one point of view | ||
| + | * self-censorship by institutions, normally carried out by liberals in positions of authority and influence within the organization - particularly in the [[Lamestream media]] | ||
(add more) | (add more) | ||
[[Category:Liberalism]] | [[Category:Liberalism]] | ||
Revision as of 22:10, September 30, 2012
Tools of censorship are devices used primarily by liberals to exclude disliked ideologies and to promote close-mindedness. Examples include:
- misusing copyright law to silence the other side and deprive the public of another point of view
- feigning offense to silence the other side and prevent it from praying or criticizing liberal dogma
- claiming that the Constitution requires a wall of separation of church and state to exclude anything religious from schools
- excessive name-calling in order to bully the other side into silence
- boycotts of businesses, such as Chick-Fil-A, that don't follow the their agenda
- cherry-picking to present only one point of view
- self-censorship by institutions, normally carried out by liberals in positions of authority and influence within the organization - particularly in the Lamestream media
(add more)