Difference between revisions of "Talk:Free Enterprise"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Please, unions are not contrary to Free Enterprise, they represent a recognition by workers that labor is a commodity and so they attempt to establish a way to effectively market...")
 
(Like other anti-competitive behavior, unions that demand mandatory membership as a condition of employment at unionized companies -- as occurs in Democrat-controlled states -- are an interference with)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Please, unions are not contrary to Free Enterprise, they represent a recognition by workers that labor is a commodity and so they attempt to establish a way to effectively market labor. [[User:SteveSpagnola|SteveSpagnola]] 01:33, 17 November 2012 (EST)
 
Please, unions are not contrary to Free Enterprise, they represent a recognition by workers that labor is a commodity and so they attempt to establish a way to effectively market labor. [[User:SteveSpagnola|SteveSpagnola]] 01:33, 17 November 2012 (EST)
 +
 +
:Like other anti-competitive behavior, unions that demand mandatory membership as a condition of employment at unionized companies -- as occurs in Democrat-controlled states -- are an interference with free enterprise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 07:41, 17 November 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 12:41, November 17, 2012

Please, unions are not contrary to Free Enterprise, they represent a recognition by workers that labor is a commodity and so they attempt to establish a way to effectively market labor. SteveSpagnola 01:33, 17 November 2012 (EST)

Like other anti-competitive behavior, unions that demand mandatory membership as a condition of employment at unionized companies -- as occurs in Democrat-controlled states -- are an interference with free enterprise.--Andy Schlafly 07:41, 17 November 2012 (EST)