User talk:Aschlafly

Welcome to Aschlafly's talk page. Please place complaints about other users or other trolling content at Conservapedia:User complaints. If Andy is interested in hearing your complaint, he will respond there. Thank you.

Wall Street Journal article on how Trump talked to Vladimir Putin according to Trump as given in an interview

Wall Street Journal article: Weekend Interview: Trump Tangles With the Journal’s Editors:

Here is the key excerpt:

Mr. Gigot: “Would you use military force against a blockade on Taiwan?”

Mr. Trump: “I wouldn’t have to, because he respects me and he knows I’m f— crazy.”

Vladimir Putin knows it too, in Mr. Trump’s telling: “I said to Putin, ‘Vladimir, we have a great relationship.’ I got along with him great. He’s a different kind of a character, I will tell you, much different than anybody under—I knew him very well. I said, ‘Vladimir, if you go after Ukraine, I am going to hit you so hard, you’re not even going to believe it. I’m going to hit you right in the middle of fricking Moscow.’ I said, ‘We’re friends. I don’t want to do it, but I have no choice.’ He goes, ‘No way.’ I said, ‘Way.’ I said, ‘You’re going to be hit so hard, and I’m going to take those f— domes right off your head.’ Because, you know, he lives under the domes.” Conservative (talk) 08:00, October 23, 2024 (EDT)

Hyperbole. Use your brain for one minute: Trump can't nuke Moscow over of a non-NATO member. This type of rhetoric is used to appeal to idiot voters, such as yourself.

Stick with your Russia Russia Russia scam, you only create more confusion playing both sides of the fence. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 12:33, October 23, 2024 (EDT)

Oh, I forgot that Trump was incapable of using the bomb unless globalist NATO got involved. Which amendment to the United States Constitution said "Nuclear weapons should only be used to defend fellow NATO memebrs"? RobSmith strikes again with his utter incompetence. Go troll somewhere else. MayGodBless (talk) 13:27, October 23, 2024 (EDT)

I see User:Cons needs help now so he calls in his support network.

Is the argument now that Trump and MAGA supporters would willfully violate international law in an act of reckless nuclear bravado? RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 13:34, October 23, 2024 (EDT)

BTW, Putin says Trump's version is bs. It's just election crunch hype. But I have no doubt User:Conservative is stupid naive enough to believe it.

Note in the above linked video: the translators claim Putin used the phrase "Western partners". We have not heard any high-level Russians use that phrase since the SMO began. In fact, the Russians made an official statement it would not be used, and phrases like "unfriendly nations" have been substituted. This is how, properly, public diplomacy is conducted (which we Americans have not seen since the Abraham Accords or Trump meeting with Kim jong un). IOWs, read the tea leaves, or actually, we're seeing the art of Kremlinology reborn. This is an outreach to Trump, Orban, and a few others in the West. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 04:09, October 26, 2024 (EDT)

Kremlinology 102 (con't): When Putin says "resume relations" in the above video, that means "lift sanctions". It does not mean "resume dialogue" or "resume negotiations". There will be no "frozen conflict", and no "ceasefire" until NATO leaves Ukraine and Russia's security concerns are addressed. The big problem is, there is no trust on the Russian side of America's word, be it written treaties or oral agreements. This means the US must make serious concessions just to get to a "ceasefire". RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 04:31, October 26, 2024 (EDT)

If Russia sanctions are so ineffective, why does Pathetic Putin whine about how Liberal Russia is being sanctioned? I appreciate that you are literally only capable of spaming propaganda, but this is something even Sleepy Joe could understand. MayGodBless (talk) 15:58, October 30, 2024 (EDT)

Although Trump has merely a fraction of the authoritarian tendencies of Putin/Biden (And has more checks and balances concerning his power given the U.S. Constitution and culture), he does have them as can be seen here: Authoritarian governments and human nature. Plus, given his reputation for impulsivity/unpredictability Trump is playing poker with Putin. In addition, Putin was tougher on Russia than Obama (Armed Ukraine with anti-tank missiles, tougher sanctions, ramped up oil production, etc.). At the end of the day, Trump displayed the right proportion of carrot/stick and diplomacy with Putin/Russia. It's too bad the Russia hoax, impeachment, the pandemic and other distractions/concerns made it harder for Trump to develop better relations with Russia. Conservative (talk) 13:49, October 23, 2024 (EDT)

Go back to your Russiagate hole. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 17:19, October 23, 2024 (EDT)

User:Conservative's understanding of history is on a par with Kamala Harris. [4] RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 22:57, October 23, 2024 (EDT)

You still haven't figured out that Pathetic Putin is a dictator. As I said, you are worse than Glitch McConnell, Sleepy Joe, and Kalifornia Kamala combined. MayGodBless (talk) 01:25, October 26, 2024 (EDT)

Ok. You have expressed Glitch McConnell, Sleepy Joe, and Kalifornia Kamala's point of view clearly. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 01:49, October 26, 2024 (EDT)

Stopped clocks are right twice a day. I also happen to agree with them that America is the greatest country on Earth. Just as Trump does and the great Phyllis Schlafly did. You seem to think it is Liberal Russia. MayGodBless (talk) 18:40, October 26, 2024 (EDT)

You seem to be in agreement with your pro-LGBT neocon warmonger brethren User:Conservative, and just as ill-informed and lacking analytical abilities RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 19:01, October 26, 2024 (EDT)

Just because I support USA does not mean I support LGBT. Sorry, try again. MayGodBless (talk) 15:58, October 30, 2024 (EDT)

Jesus said that "Wisdom is vindicated by her works" (Matthew 11:19). The birth pangs of the destruction of the Russian economy can be seen clearly. Sky-high dogged inflation, labor shortages, lower labor productivity since the invasion of Ukraine, a Russian ruble decline and the threat of stagflation on the horizon. See: Russia’s Central Bank Raises Key Rate to Historic 21%, Signals Aggressive Fight to Curb Inflation.

At the launch of the invasion of Ukraine, Russia's internationally acclaimed Russian Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina attempted to resign her position, but was told by Putin that he had to stay in her position.[5] Well-known for wearing jewelry at conferences that signaled to the financial markets her policy thinking, she wore funeral black clothes and wore no jewelry to a conference signaling the death of the Russian economy. Weep and wail Russians. Putinomics, Putin's imperialism and impending low oil prices due to higher US/Saudi oil production may hammer the Russian economy. Oh Mother Russia, why didn't you diversify your economy like UAU and Saudi Arabia did so your your economy is not so dependent on oil sales?[6][7] Conservative (talk) 09:44, October 26, 2024 (EDT)

Put the meth pipe down. It doesn't work well with you earlier diagnosis and prescriptions. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 15:59, October 26, 2024 (EDT)

Dear Andy, may I ask...

May I ask, isn't it Make America Great Again (instead of American)? https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Make_American_Great_Again&oldid=2082314 Regards. God bless. Telling (talk)

Thanks. Telling (talk) 15:23, October 28, 2024 (EDT)

You are so right. Thanks for speaking up!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 01:15, October 29, 2024 (EDT)

Pleasure. Telling (talk) 17:14, October 29, 2024 (EDT)

Will KBJ "I don't know who is a woman" vote for MRS. Harris?

The media is so caught up in Harris campaign for the WOMAN Kamala.. While: https://www.foxnews.com/media/usa-today-ketanji-brown-jackson-marsha-blackburn Just thinking out loud.Dianne3000 (talk) 14:54, November 3, 2024 (EST)

119th United States Congress

Thanks to User:Conservative's trolling, there is probably no one willing to chronicle the 119th United States Congress. User:Conservative severely disrupted my reporting on the 118th United States Congress, and I am not willing to commit to any more long term projects until you take action against User:Conservative's long term trolling. Thanks.

See also Category:United States Representatives. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 20:34, November 6, 2024 (EST)

Is capitalism working in Russia? Its economy is ranked 131th freest in the world (mostly unfree - Heritage Foundation)

"Russia's economic freedom score is 52, making its economy the 131st freest in the 2024 Index of Economic Freedom." - Heritage Foundation.[8]

Russia's GNP ranking is 10th in the world.[9] Russia's GNP (nominal) per capita is ranked 65th in the world.[10]

Remember according to the international relations expert John Mearsheimer, military might rest on economic might since it is expensive to field a military.

This is in response to the main page right post of "Putin's military industrial complex - when capitalism works." [11]

I used to be more interested in Russia, but the ButterGate scandal put a damper on that.

Russian President Vladimir Putin says that Russia's war economy is well balanced to supply both guns and butter, but the price of butter itself is now soaring as surging inflation distorts parts of the economy. The price of a block of butter has risen by 25.7 per cent since December, according to the state statistics service.

'The Armageddon with butter is escalating,' Russian economists claim on Telegram.

See: Butter prices soar in Russia amid surging inflation in war economy, CBC News, November 2, 2024 and Russians Resort to Stealing Butter Amid Shortages, Newsweek, October 29, 2024

In 2024, the Russian ruble lost a LOT of its value compared to the US dollar

I hope this information helps clarify matters. Conservative (talk) 08:45, November 24, 2024 (EST)

Red lines: What do Obama and Vladimir Putin have in common? Reports of Russia's nuclear saber-rattling on main page right

"Ten years ago, the U.S. and Britain were roiled by the debate over how to respond to the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons in that country’s civil war. President Barack Obama had threatened the previous year that the use of such weapons would cross a “red line” for his administration, and when the attack occurred Obama moved to follow through on his ill-advised threat."[12]

During the war in Ukraine, I have lost count on how many of Vladimir Putin's red lines have been crossed during his nuclear saber rattling, but no nukes have flown. And there are reports that a drunken Russian official was involved in this nuclear saber rattling (See: Vladimir Putin's administration staff 'are starting the day with a bottle of vodka' and former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev is 'often drunk when he writes his apocalyptic threats of nuclear war', Daily Mail, June 14, 2023 and Putin’s ‘stressed’ administration staff start each day with bottle of vodka: report, The New York Post, June 14, 2023).

Putin is violating the "poker rule". If you bluff too many times, it undermines your credibility.

Of course, if Russia has its back to the wall (Economy becomes much worse than it is now such as its sky-high inflation), it might use nukes so I hope a cease-fire or peace plan is worked out concerning the war in Ukraine as soon as possible. Conservative (talk) 11:19, November 24, 2024 (EST)

My intellectual dual challenge to [redacted] given on 11-26-2024

As you know, RobSmith has called various Conservapedians dumb.

'My challenge to RobSmith - an intellectual dual challenge:' I hereby challenge RobSmith to an intellectual dual. In 2028, we will each take a Mensa IQ qualifying test and let's see who is the smart one and who is the less intelligent one! Andy Schlafly will be the judge and examine the results of the tests. If RobSmith accepts this challenge, I know what phrase I will utter after the intellectual dual is over. The phrase is: Olé! Olé! Olé!

I am giving RobSmith about 3 years to increase his intellectual prowess because I wish to give him a sporting chance to win.

Key question: Andy, do you believe that RobSmith will accept this intellectual dual challenge or do you think that he will chicken out? Conservative (talk) 22:26, November 26, 2024 (EST)

I told you, I am not interested in any of your challenges. You just earned a 24 hour block for trolling, spam, and harassment. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 22:31, November 26, 2024 (EST)

User: RobSmith

RobSmith, just as I suspected. You chickened out! Conservative (talk) 22:35, November 26, 2024 (EST)

User:Conservative: You've shown for years how much respect you have for anything I say on your talk page. So why would I waste my breath? RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 23:32, November 26, 2024 (EST)

User:Conservative: If you don't like being called dumb, there's a simple solution: Don't act like an idiot. For example, spamming a challenge to me on Andy talk and the email list, then posting in the same breath, "I am not interested in the words of a bla bla bla". All you are doing is wasting everybody's time. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 00:19, November 27, 2024 (EST)

Mensa Society of narcissists meet here. [1]

Incidenatlly, I believe I told you the story how I was invited to a Mensa dinner several years ago. There were 9 men and 1 woman. Before the night was over, I was convinced at least 7 of the 9 men were gay. I left with the impression that the Mensa society of narcissists who think they are in the top 2% of intellect was nothing more than a cover for gay rendezvous.

But go ahead. Continue with you narcissistic self-deception about your own intelligence. You may discover Mensa is little different than a gay bathhouse. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 01:17, November 27, 2024 (EST)

As I recall, the evening began with each attendee introducing themself by name and occupation (this was back in the day when homosexuality was illegal, so they spoke in code and double entendre). One of the first guys introduced himself as a urologist who was mainly "interested in penises". It was all downhill from there. As the night progressed, I could barely keep from losing my lunch over the dinner table. I couldn't get out of there fast enough without being rude to my host who invited me.

Don't let these horror stories impede your interest and preoccupation with Mensa and gay bathhouses, however. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 01:46, November 27, 2024 (EST)

RobSmith, the two Conservapedians you called dumb are smarter than you. Ahhhhh, it burns! Ahhh, it burns! Ahhhhh! Conservative (talk) 02:26, November 27, 2024 (EST)

Oh good. I'm not a narcissist like yourself, as this whole thread aptly demonstrates. Neither am I interested in a narcissistic rivalry such as you yourself are.

BTW, if you're so smart, why do you lack confidence? Do you feel threatened or challenged? RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 03:26, November 27, 2024 (EST)

Kash Patel & others

If I am to update, create articles and report on the Second Trump Administration, User:Conservative's trolling activity must be severely curtailed and restrained. Thank you. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 21:28, December 5, 2024 (EST)

Topic ban for admin who doesn't understand international politics

Jake Sullivan [2] to Hillary Clinton: Al Qaeda is on our side.

The new Caliph of Syria. Jake Sullivan finally got his boy to overthrow Assad.

Andy, as you know, I sent the below email to you and other Conservapedians.

"Dear Andy and Conservapedians,

It's official. On December 7, 2024 RobSmithism died. Russia has now declined to the point that it is a regional power due to loss of key military bases and Assad's regime falling.

I predicted the decline of Russia and was proven right! And RobSmith was dead wrong!

Please read: Syrian army command tells officers that Assad's rule has ended, officer says

To read why this means that Russia is now a regional power and why this is such a devastating loss of Russian power and prestige, please read: Russian Navy Evacuates Second Key Base This Year. Another body blow to Russian strategic objectives and national pride!

Question: Anyone remember the biblical story of Haman who was hung on the scaffold he built for Mordecai? This was poetic justice.

As a means of poetic justice, I suggest that Andy give RobSmith a topic ban on the topic of international politics/relations given his big fail on the topic of Russia! 🤣

First the Russia ruble declined, then inflation spiraled up the cost of Russian butter and potatoes and now Russia has become a regional power! Oh, the humanity!"

In response, User: Karajou wrote: "I'm fully aware of the news. Let's see what our self-proclaimed international relations "expert" has to say about all this, and above all, why his "expertise" has failed." Conservative (talk) 09:49, December 8, 2024 (EST)

User:Conservative: Even your Russophobic NeverTrump blood brother Michael Tracey wrote this opinion piece for Newsweek: Syria's New Rulers Are Former Al-Qaeda Terrorists. Why Is D.C. Celebrating Them? Want to edit war some more over you anti-Christian hate screeds on MPR, on the email list. or discussion pages, you silly, vindictive putz? RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 19:37, December 9, 2024 (EST)

Incidentally, Russia has another naval base in the Mediterranean - they got it after the last US regime change screw up in Libya when the US killed its own ally in the War on Terror, Mummar Khaddafi. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 10:19, December 8, 2024 (EST)

RobSmith, I doubt Russia has a naval base in Libya. In June of 2024, the Africa Defense Forum website reported concerning the country of Libya: "Russia also plans to build a naval base at Tobruk, where its operatives could influence traffic across the Mediterranean, expand smuggling and perhaps disrupt shipping."

Russia, a country where 20% of its citizens doesn't have indoor toilets[13] and a country that is unable to regularly maintain its only wreck of an air carrier[14], and whose economy has sky-high inflation[15], built a replacement to its Syria naval base in less than 6 months? Where is your evidence? Onus probandi actori incumbit. That is Latin for "He who asserts must prove". Conservative (talk) 10:50, December 8, 2024 (EST)

I will also point out that in August 2024, it was reported: Is Libya on the brink of a new civil war?. So even if Russia did manage to build such a naval base in Libya, it could disappear like the one in Syria.

Russia is in decline and it is essentially a regional power now. That's the reality. Embrace it. Conservative (talk) 11:18, December 8, 2024 (EST)

RobSmith, the USA has 4 naval bases in the Mediterranean Sea area. The USA also has a productive and innovative labor force (which has a far higher labor productivity rate than both China and Russia), a large diversified economy, the most deep and liquid capital markets, etc. See: Essay: The United States will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future and Essay: Business is more powerful than military might. All REAL Americans know this! Conservative (talk) 11:39, December 8, 2024 (EST)

What an idiot. If ever there was evidence MSM makes you more dumb, this is it. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 13:54, December 8, 2024 (EST)

Viral tweet during the Zelensky regime.

I don't get why Conservapedia is so BRICS and Russia sided instead of having a more neutral point of view, Trump himself tries to mediate, is not Anti-Ukraine or Anti-Russia, although he has been tough on both leaders when warranted, even more so on Putin (unlike what the MSM says). Trump has even said good things on Zelenski, so he is not like, Russian-sided as the Media portriats him. Conservapedia is not on the MAGA line on the topic, but on the Putin one at this point, which is kind of weird and there doesn't seem to be a consensus, specially in a topic that is currently dividing right-wing people nowadays as seen on this site. Aschlafly

should speak out on this, and urge that a consensus be reached among the editors, otherwise this editorial conflict will go on forever, and on the articles both points of view should be expressed in some way so the reader gets to choose.--CatolicoAustral (talk) 14:52, December 8, 2024 (EST)

CP is not BRICS/Russia "one-sided". As the mast on MPR says, "What the MSM isn't reporting". RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 15:06, December 8, 2024 (EST)

As to Andy speaking out on this and urging consensus - I've been arguing this for as long as Conservapedia has been in existence, but was accused of being a "useful idiot of an atheist website" and got desysopped at the urging of User:Conservative. It is impossible to forge a consensus with user:Conservative; he spams discussion pages with nonsense and personal attacks and refuses to engage privately on his talk page. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 15:25, December 8, 2024 (EST)

With all due respect for the present editors, I have readed many sides of the topics of international relations, many views, and yeah, Conservapedia currently is the opposite to the Western MSM in many issues, but on many talking points is on the same page, same editorial line of BRICS MSM, some Spanish speaking examples being TeleSur (Pro-Maduro Venezuelan) or HispanTV (Iranian), and this according to my own criteria.--CatolicoAustral (talk) 15:36, December 8, 2024 (EST)

This entire thread is not about policy; it originated as a personal attack on another editor, and User:Conservative continues spamming the same personal attacks he been spamming for years.

A policy discussion evidently belongs elsewhere (and don't bother with the email list, either) RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 15:44, December 8, 2024 (EST)

IMO, this latest troll spree of User:Conservative in praise of the desecularization of Syria by US-backed terrorists, mocking Russian protection of their fellow Orthodox Christian Syrians, his longing for return to Obama-Biden foreign policy. etc. is simply more evidence that not only is he uninformed, his real objective is harassment of other editors.

We've seen it before. Covid comes from eating bats. Vaccine mandates are like seatbelt laws, etc. etc. etc. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 19:59, December 8, 2024 (EST)

The John Durham investigation revealed Jake Sullivan was one of the first to push the Russia hoax; this morning User:Conservative edit warred on MPR wanting to push MORE Jake Sullivan talking points. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 20:06, December 8, 2024 (EST)

Any idea how many Christians left in Syria

Sources seem to be confusing. WaPo says it was reduced to 25,000.Dianne3000 (talk) 15:51, December 8, 2024 (EST)

I'm not sure; User:Conservative was peeing his pants with glee this morning as Russian protection of their fellow Orthodox Christians dried up.

No wonder user:Conservative is so sympathetic to Al Qaeda, they just desecularized Syria. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 17:28, December 8, 2024 (EST)

If WaPo is right 75% left since 2011.Dianne3000 (talk) 17:44, December 8, 2024 (EST)

I don't know who wants to take WaPo's word on anything, but that was during the Obama-Biden Arab Spring, which user:Conservative apparently also supported, and caused the Russians to go in. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 17:49, December 8, 2024 (EST)

Petition for Aschlafly to determine the foreign policy Conservapedia principles to follow

I want you to lead and solve the community disagreements.

Mr. Aschlafly

I request you as the natural leader of this community/site to define an editorial line base in regards to the position that Conservapedia takes on the Foreign Policy topics, on this era that will be probably be known as a New Cold War Era. You need to be a mediator like Mr. President Trump.

The reasons are the next:

• Editors have so different opinions on the topics that a consensus talk is very hard to reach.
• The site should probably take a neutral stance talking about the bad and the good of foreign governments that are controversial in regards to Convervatives support.
• Your intervention is needed, otherwise the conflict will be ethernal, if addressed would be a huge step on solving issues of the current community.

What to consider:

• There are conservatives in every country.
• For example, the Baltic people conservatives have conserns about Russia, also the Russian conservatives have conserns about NATO. Both points of views are hold by patriotic people, however, their national ideas clash, thus the conflicts exist.
• Consider the interests of fellow Christian groups around the World, Middle East included.

--CatolicoAustral (talk) 16:01, December 8, 2024 (EST)

Andy laid out Conservapedia editorial viewpoint on Russia in the Russia article. However, an editor directly disputed that stance, and refuted it in a series of Essays. That's fine. However, those Essays, the view of one editor, DO NOT belong in General Categories with Mainspace articles. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 16:07, December 8, 2024 (EST)

Personal remark removed Karajou (talk) 16:11, December 8, 2024 (EST)

In any case, Mr. Andy should explicitly say if the Russia article point of view is the official stance or not, so we can know, so, my petition remains in that regard, clarification is really needed.--CatolicoAustral (talk) 16:13, December 8, 2024 (EST)

I also am raising a policy question. Opinions and Essays do not belong in General Categories.

And yes, editorial stance should be determined by consensus. I've argued this for years. Here's where enforcement, which is seriously lacking, of the Guidelines on user conduct come into play. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 16:22, December 8, 2024 (EST)

We all can agree that Mr. Andy Schlafly should lead us, so, I hope to have his response when he can respond and help the community to solve the issues.--CatolicoAustral (talk) 16:24, December 8, 2024 (EST)

Two doomed nations: China and Russia. The natural disasters of biblical proportions to hit China in the last two decades. And Russia's bad choice to have a "partnership without limits" with a nation under divine judgment

Re: Syria fiasco for Russia

With Putinism in shambles, is Xi coming to the rescue? Not so fast: "Why Xi Jinping is Removing His Top Army Generals in China." PeterKa (talk) 07:30, December 10, 2024 (EST)

Alliance crumbling? Dianne3000 (talk) 07:53, December 10, 2024 (EST)

Xi Jinping is a complete mess which has negatively affected China. The last person to place themselves in China's constitution while he was still in power was Mao. Xi has the biggest cult of personality since Mao. Xi has weeded out everyone who has the potential to rival him and in so doing removed the most competent people. It's kind of like the recent Democrat presidential candidates who seemingly purposefully picked VPs who were incompetent such as Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, but it's much more extensive throughout China's communist government.

Between China's demographic crisis, its various financial crises (property crisis, high youth unemployment, etc.) and Xi Jinping's "leadership", China is going to see a proverbial train wreck for the country as a whole within 10-15 years. Which is one of the reasons why the essays The United States will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future and Skepticism about China remaining a global power ring true.

And given that Xi is the biggest persecutor of Christians in the world, he most certainly does not have the "mandate from heaven". "In the last few decades, almost all types of major hazards except volcanic eruptions have hit China; these include earthquakes, typhoons, floods, droughts and sandstorms, storm surges, landslides and debris flows, hailstorms, cold waves, heat waves, pests and rodent disease, forest and grassland fires, and red tides." (See: Natural Disaster Challenges in China: Key Trends and Insights). Conservative (talk) 12:59, December 10, 2024 (EST)

I am so glad that the USA is not a "partner without limits" with China like Russia is. When the proverbial lightning bolt of judgment really hits China very, very hard because they ignored the previous obvious natural disaster signs that China is under divine judgment, it's best not to be embracing China. Conservative (talk) 13:24, December 10, 2024 (EST)

Your thoughts in this matter? Conservative (talk) 13:54, December 10, 2024 (EST)

A Senior Admin has forged the electronic signature of an editor

User:Conservative has again forged the electronic signature of an editor on this page and at least one other editor's usertalk page.

https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:NishantXavier&diff=prev&oldid=2091665

This is an egregious abuse of power by an Admin to stir dissension between editors, and may even by a violation of federal law. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 08:27, December 12, 2024 (EST)

While he talks the talk about electronic sigs, he refuses to walk the walk. RobSmith believes he has the right to plagiarize from off-site articles and blogs, and post the material here, as in the B21 Raider article. Plagiarism is a LEGAL issue, as well as a violation of Conservapedia rules. Karajou (talk) 02:55, December 14, 2024 (EST)

Problem fixed

The problem we spoke about over the phone has now been fixed. Thanks. Conservative (talk) 00:07, December 30, 2024 (EST)

A Senior Admin has done serious damage to furthering content creation

Should we demonize and trash talk the next German Chancellor from the conservative AfD who is pro-Putin, anti-globalist, and a rightwing populist in the Donald Trump mold? According to Elon Musk, the AfD is the last hope Germany has. [16]

I really need an answer to this question before wasting time creating an article about the gay conservative populist in the mold of Donald Trump who is likely the next Chancellor of Germany.

She has two strikes against her according to user:Conservative; she's considered a Putin puppet and she's gay. But Elon Musk backs her and wants to do a interview with her on X like he did with Trump.[17]

My problem is, I don't really have the time to waste writing the article if I am going to continue to be User:Conservative's target for trolling, and User:Conservative refuses to discuss the problem. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 21:30, December 31, 2024 (EST)

Setting aside the mind reading RobSmith is engaging in above and his constantly equating facts/evidence that he doesn't like to trolling, it is impossible to have discussions with RobSmith who uses the crutches of "hide templates", reversions and illogical/unsupported/gossipy ad hominem attacks (personal attacks) rather than well-reasoned discussions.

These crutches that he uses are obviously a reflection of the weakness/errancy of his political opinions that he obviously can't support or debate.

Because of this, I very frequently don't read what he attempts to post to me because it would be like attempting to talk to a brick wall. I prefer cordial, logical and well-supported material/discussions that I have with others. I have asked that this be addressed as far as talk pages, but so far it hasn't. Conservative (talk) 08:23, January 1, 2025 (EST)

It is not worth the time to promote Alice Weidel as a conservative populist and anti-globalist if User:Conservative in his vindictiveness is going to continue trolling me personally as he has done for 3 years now. Note: None of my longterm projects such as Russiagate, Ukrainian collusion, or NATO war in Ukraine have been updated since October 2023 because of his senseless, vindictive, childish, nonstop targeted daily trolling. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 12:07, January 1, 2025 (EST)

I have attempted to discuss this matter with User:Conservative and he refuses to respond. Our readers will remain as stupid and ignorant as User:Conservative because you allow his ceaseless trolling and willful violation of Conservapedia Guidelines. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 12:14, January 1, 2025 (EST)

Andy knows who the vindicate person is (And its not me) and that I have made attempts to have peaceable relations with you. User: Karajou and User: DavidB4 is aware of this matter as well. And I know that User: DavidB4 is irritated at you for violating the castle of his user talk page on several occasions. Given that User: DavidB4 helps Andy with the technical aspects of the website, your rude behavior relative to User: DavidB4 is definitely not wanted by Andy and other Conservapedians. Conservative (talk) 12:19, January 1, 2025 (EST)

Last year for example, he intimidated editors from participating in the Conservative of the Year project with his trolling, and then boasted about it to you:

My geopolitics essays work is done until 2030. I put the icing on the cake of my geopolitics essays.

Editors see this conduct and your reaction to it. In 2023 we had a record number of participants in the Conservative of the Year project. This year only four counting me and yourself.

His trolling, and your tolerance of it, is hampering Conservapedia's growth in number of editors and in content creation. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 12:28, January 1, 2025 (EST)

At lot has happened in the world since I made the October 3, 2023 remark that had an element of humor to it (As far as the icing on the cake) that has sparked many people to be more interested in international affairs. For example, the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas. There have been other things happening as well such as the upcoming Trump tariffs, escalating war in Ukraine, etc.

"A lot has happened..." Yes. And User:Conservative's targeted trolling has hampered article creation and reporting on it, thus destroying Conservapedia's ability to be a social media influence platform.

Given the flubs related to understanding international politics that you have made (China's economy, not having a very good understanding of China's culture as evidenced by your misspelling of the word kowtow by spelling the word "cow-tow", etc.) and your rudeness towards me in this matter related to my content on these matters, I certainly feel no obligation towards you as far as how much or little content I create relative to international politics.

"Given the flubs bla bla bla" more unsubstantiated lies and innuendo.

With that being said, I have some goals/plans that I want to attend to so I probably will create less content on international politics for awhile. Conservative (talk) 12:53, January 1, 2025 (EST)

User:Conservative's targeted trolling activity, and Andy's tolerance of it, has lessened and destroyed Conservapedia's status as a credible social media influence platform at a time when readers are turning away from mainstream media and looking for alternative sources of information.. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 13:08, January 1, 2025 (EST)

I tried a few times to work out harmonious relations a few times by telephone, but you were very disagreeable. Andy is aware of this and it's not surprising that he will not talk to you via the phone. Conservative (talk) 13:24, January 1, 2025 (EST)

Your user talk page is for communication between editors - doubly so for communication between sysops. You have never ever been a cooperative editor or Admin for as long as I have known you. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 13:40, January 1, 2025 (EST)

If you don't like hide templates on your trolling puss on article talk pages, stop reverting good faith efforts to communicate with you on your talk page. You started this BS years ago.

And you are so dense you don't realize that reverting editor comments on you own talk page is a violation of the pledge you made in the CP Civility Association. That is the horrific example you set to junior editors. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 13:48, January 1, 2025 (EST)

Personal remark removed Conservative (talk) 14:16, January 1, 2025 (EST)

Quit your trolling. Spamming the thread with hypertext so no one has the patience to read it is the oldest trick in the book. I'm ready to use hide templates again. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 14:33, January 1, 2025 (EST)

It's not worth wasting time creating the 2025 Bourbon Street terrorist attack (which likely will shape much of 2025 and the Trump administration) due to User:Conservative's incessant trolling. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There}

Likewise we have virtually nothing on the 2024 Magdeburg Christmas Market attack while User:Conservative occupies editors' time daily, spamming his obsession with gay bathhouses in Moscow or Russian potholes. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 17:59, January 1, 2025 (EST)

Shalom

Dear Andy. Shalom, is ALSO associated with 'wholeness, completeness'. [שלם,שלום ] . Which explains Psalm 38:7. Thank you.

Shalom-Peace to you and to the world.Telling (talk) 21:21, January 11, 2025 (EST)

Great point. Same to you!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:28, January 11, 2025 (EST)

Saw the Sheehy?

Hi Andy, did you catch the Sheehy line? https://www.foxnews.com/politics/freshman-gop-senator-sets-internet-ablaze-with-best-response-to-hegseths-answer-on-gender-question It was cool.Telling (talk) 16:35, January 15, 2025 (EST)

That's a great line by Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-MT)! Thanks for pointing it out.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 18:19, January 15, 2025 (EST)

Trump on National Prayer Service Bishop Mariann Budde

Link

The so-called Bishop who spoke at the National Prayer Service on Tuesday morning was a Radical Left hard line Trump hater. She brought her church into the World of politics in a very ungracious way. She was nasty in tone, and not compelling or smart. She failed to mention the large number of illegal migrants that came into our Country and killed people. Many were deposited from jails and mental institutions. It is a giant crime wave that is taking place in the USA. Apart from her inappropriate statements, the service was a very boring and uninspiring one. She is not very good at her job! She and her church owe the public an apology!

Dianne3000 (talk) 08:13, January 22, 2025 (EST)

The best thing to do when confronted with a godless preacher is to walk out of the church service. Twice I have walked out of churches when a so-called pastor was a woman (The New Testament is against the notion of a woman pastor).

Voting with your feet is powerful. People around the world are leaving bad countries or bad areas within countries. Conservative (talk) 10:35, January 22, 2025 (EST)

I think, Trump/Vance were extremely patient, sitting there and taking it all in. But this, CNN/MSNBC won't emphasize...Telling (talk) 10:57, January 22, 2025 (EST)

They were too passive. When it is apparent that you are being "theologically raped" via ungodly preaching and you have a means of escape, it is best to flee. Conservative (talk) 11:12, January 22, 2025 (EST)

From the bishop's "sermon":

we're scared now. There are gay, lesbian, and transgender children... See this respondDianne3000 (talk) 13:19, January 22, 2025 (EST)

Trump should have never gone to the Washington National Cathedral which is a private church run by Episcopalians. Episcopalians are a liberal denonomination. He could have gone to a conservative church. Conservative (talk) 13:23, January 22, 2025 (EST)

This, if true, is shocking and so sad

INFURIATING: Rep. Nancy Mace Reveals Millions of Taxpayer Dollars Spent on Shocking Experiments to Create Transgender Monkeys, Rats, and More https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/infuriating-rep-nancy-mace-reveals-millions-taxpayer-dollars/

May God have mercy on their soul (of those who were involved in this robbery for twisted ideas).Telling (talk) 20:14, February 6, 2025 (EST)

Why does Conservapedia have entire subchapter headings referring the reader to Google searches?

Doesn't seem very Christian, Conservative, or educational, IMO.

Better yet, the question should be, "Why does Conservapedia even exist?", if this is considered a legitimate way of building content. RobS^{I don’t really care, Margaret} 00:20, February 8, 2025 (EST)

So killing & The Art of War is a creative solution to problem solving

Hitler & Putin must be creative geniuses, in the original author's sick mind.

Edit warring over the USAID scandal

User:Conservative was forewarned 3 years ago much of his sourcing was suspect, nevertheless he continued 24/7 for three solid years pumping in propaganda funded by USAID.

He has begun edit warring already to protect and deny that much of his sources were funded by USAID. [18] RobS^{I don’t really care, Margaret} 09:44, February 8, 2025 (EST)

Please give picture upload rights to this editor as per our phone conversation

Please give picture upload rights to this editor as per our phone conversation: User:Joeylad

Thanks. Conservative (talk) 20:51, February 21, 2025 (EST)

Looks like Keith Olbermann has been a regular reader

Looks like Keith Olbermann has been a regular reader. [3]

RobS^{I don’t really care, Margaret} 00:09, February 26, 2025 (EST)

Here is why it is not worth the time and effort adding any new fresh content to Conservapedia articles:

User:Conservative has spent 3 years making these sources, and other USAID-funded links, credible. He has steadfastly refused to discuss the credibility of these sources in any meaningful sense. When criticized, he responds by doubling and tripling spam links to these sources in his redundant essays, which then dominate Google search results since you allow him to link his essays to Mainspace Categories. The net result is suppressing other editor's contributions, and promoting himself and his spam, which he refuses to discuss in any rational and meaningful sense. RobS^{I don’t really care, Margaret} 09:15, February 26, 2025 (EST)

User:Conservative's warmonging [19] needs to be quashed. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:28, March 7, 2025 (EST)

What is your explanation as an engineering and computer science grad?

I know you went to Princeton and took classes in engineering and computer science. I also know you are pro-capitalism.

Please read:

• How Russia is losing the AI race

• Embarrassingly for the Kremlin, Russian AI Isn’t Good Enough for Its Own Disinformation

Why do you think that Russia is so far behind the USA when it comes to AI? Even the godless Soviets were able to have a Sputnik moment.

I have some thoughts on why this is happening, but I would like to hear your thoughts. Conservative (talk) 11:40, March 7, 2025 (EST)

P.S. As far as the first link, I just added some information relating to Russia, alcoholism and innovation. Conservative (talk) 17:32, March 7, 2025 (EST)

It's pretty obvious User:Conservative is aligning with Democrats and actively working against President Trump's Number One priority, and he has been doing so for a long time:

“

You want me to say really terrible things about Putin and then say 'Hi Vladimir. How are we doing on the deal?". That doesn't work. [20]

”

Incidentaly, The Bell reeks of USAID funding. [21]

Note: Moscow Times is a USAID deep state front.

User:Conservative's warmonging [22] needs to be quashed. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:42, March 7, 2025 (EST)

Andy, look at this: Putin unveils plans for Russia's AI development amid western Sanctions, 2025

If you look at the video, near the beginning there is a panel and one lady is dressed in Muslim garb. Russia has a big Muslim population and Muslims make up about 9-26% of the Russian population. Last time I checked, Russia is not a big leader in AI and neither are Muslim countries. Conservative (talk) 12:07, March 7, 2025 (EST)

Huh? What? User:Conservative's warmonging [23] needs to be quashed. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:14, March 7, 2025 (EST)

Is Donald Trump going to be tougher on Russia than the Democrats again?

Also, 'Nobody's Been Tougher on Russia Than Me,' Says Trump, 2019.

Is Donald Trump going to be tougher on Russia than the Democrats again? Conservative (talk) 12:25, March 7, 2025 (EST)

Oh yah? What is there left to sanction that hasn't made Russia stronger and more independent of the West?

User:Conservative's warmonging [24] needs to be quashed.

Andy, the problem is User:Conservative isn't conversant in foreign policy, let alone knowledgeable.

President Trump has made it clear, as late as this morning, Peace with Russia is his Number One priority. Yet User:Conservative, as late as this morning, continues his warmongering and Russophobic bigotry.

There is a real possibility President Trump can fail in his Number One priority, and no thanks at least in part to User:Conservative's warmongering. User:Conservative's warmonging [25] needs to be quashed. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:39, March 7, 2025 (EST)

The next 4 years

Andy,

Conservapedia will be useless in furthering the MAGA agenda in the next four years if you allow User:Conservative's relentless trolling and spamming unqualified sources to dilute valid information to continue. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:55, March 7, 2025 (EST)

The USA outclasses Russia on so many dimensions that there is no real competition. Hyper-Russophiles can't compete!

As much as I hate to say it, the USA outclasses Russia on so many dimensions that there is no real competition. Hyper-Russophiles can't compete!

USA:

1. The United States became the world's most productive economy by 1890.[26] It currently has twice the labor productivity rate of Russia and four times the labor productivity rate of China.

2. It is demographic powerhouse compared to China and Russia. See: The United States Has a Keen Demographic Edge

3. It is an energy superpower that has abundant energy that is less expensive to get out of the ground than its rivals.

4. Superior government and general economic system that has a check on executive power.

5. Deep capital markets.

And these are just the tip of the American greatness iceberg! Conservative (talk) 19:04, March 7, 2025 (EST)

President Trump has made it clear, as late as this morning, Peace with Russia is his Number One priority. Yet User:Conservative, as late as this morning, continues his warmongering and Russophobic bigotry.

“

You want me to say really terrible things about Putin and then say 'Hi Vladimir. How are we doing on the deal?". That doesn't work. [27]

”

User:Conservative's warmonging [28] needs to be quashed. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:13, March 7, 2025 (EST)

The USA's border is Trump's #1 priority! Not the border of the two corrupt/authoritarian countries of Russia and Ukraine which are destined for decline due to their great demographic weaknesses and so many people fleeing their countries'! People flee countries that are in continual decline!

No man can serve two countries or two masters. America first! Conservative (talk) 19:20, March 7, 2025 (EST)

Trump said this morning peace in Ukraine is his Number One priority right now.

This is simply more evidence what an idiot you are. The subject is peace with Russia through diplomacy, not how great America is. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:31, March 7, 2025 (EST)

User:Conservative is non-conversant in international affairs, and his trolling and warmonging [29] needs to be quashed. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 19:42, March 7, 2025 (EST)

Oh, so the defeat of Nazism was a 'pyrrhic victory' now

I understand too well. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:00, March 10, 2025 (EDT)

Should I headline this? "Defeat of Nazism was a 'pyrrhic' victory." [30]

It seems to go contrary to the basis of the Trump-Putin negotiations. [31] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:05, March 10, 2025 (EDT)

It is these distortions and misreporting of historical facts that lead young editors, like User:LT, to spam Conservapedia Essays and talk pages with ideas and concepts such as Zionists are Nazis. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:23, March 10, 2025 (EDT)

• And in order to promote his distortions he misrepresented "sources", to fit his racism.Dianne3000 (talk) 15:06, March 12, 2025 (EDT)

Geez, I wonder who he learned not properly qualifying sources is perfectly acceptable in Conservapedia? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 15:39, March 13, 2025 (EDT)

What do you want to do about Massie?

Criticize Trump? Criticize Massie? Or pretend the dispute doesn't exist?

It's the realist v. ideologues again. This is the sort of idiotic debate you should encourage User:Conservative to be involved in, not geopolitical debates he knows absolutely nothing about. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 07:22, March 12, 2025 (EDT)

How about these?

• President Trump wants to primary Conservative of the Year Thomas Massie.

or

• Trump Pledges to 'Lead the Charge' Against Rep. Massie, Likens Him to Liz Cheney. [32]

or

• Reagan OMB Director David Stockman: Three Cheers For Rep. Tom Massie! [33]

I'd ask your political "expert" User:Conservative on his talk page, but I don't want to be accused of harassment. Thanks. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 08:15, March 12, 2025 (EDT)

Interesting points. Let's go with the headline I posted, for now.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:32, March 12, 2025 (EDT)

Looks good. The reasoning behind the CR is a dramatic reduction in spending now would lead to a collapse in demand, leading to unemployment, and recession. More time is needed for study. The question is, can the political will and momentum be maintained long enough to educate voters what is necessary and what needs to be sacrificed.

Meanwhile, Trump is not doing so good with conservative's with his massive deficit spending and warmongering. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 01:49, March 14, 2025 (EDT)

Looks like the Massie story is growing legs:

• Massis is more MAGA than Trump
• Judge Napolitano interviews Massie

Re: NYT liberal claptrap: It was a Tom Friedman (seated left) op-ed. I feel more of this may be necessary in coming weeks and months to refute all the User:Conservative liberal claptrap he has spammed into Conservapedia non-stop for 3 years.

We need a Thomas Friedman article - that's something User:Conservative should have done 3 years ago rather than his trolling jihad. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 13:47, March 14, 2025 (EDT)

Duly noted, but there's nothing confusing about Trump's actions as he seeks and obtains peace instead of perpetual war sought by neocons.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 13:53, March 14, 2025 (EDT)

Update: Massie criticizes Trump's special military operation in Yemen. [34] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 07:42, March 16, 2025 (EDT)

Massie, a loner. As to Trump, he seeks to give a shock in order to have calm. He is not about perpetual war - just like Andy rightfully said. It is why he pressured Zelensky. But To be a 'chicken' lame duck [Iran's suckers] and just 'take' it from Islamists is not a pro peace strategy. Looking back when Trump, in his 1st term hit Syria after chemical Assad attack ([35]). He did it once and hard but did not escalate. Telling (talk) 07:59, March 16, 2025 (EDT)

Yah but now we're getting the same "as long as it takes" rhetoric. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:47, March 19, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative owns the NYT reporter Thomas Friedman article now, seeing that he made himself Conservapedia's most articulate spokesman for Friedman's views and ideas (he and I discussed this two years ago).

• NYT Opinion - I Don’t Believe a Single Word Trump and Putin Say About Ukraine, Thomas L. Friedman, March 18, 2025.

“

I do not trust a single word that Trump and Putin say about their private conversations on Ukraine — including the words “and” and “the”...Because something has not smelled right from the start with this whole Trump-Putin deal-making on Ukraine.

”

Recall, Trump was impeached over Ukraine, a convenient fact User:Conservative has omitted from all his Russophobic trolling for years now.

"This war never should have happened and wouldn't have happened if I were president". Putin agrees. Trump was impeached because he thwarted the deep state's designs to provoke war with Russia (see for example, Lindsey_Graham#Ukraine_warmonger address to the Azov Battalion in December 2016, "2017 will be the year of offense"). RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:57, March 19, 2025 (EDT)

An Admin is spamming again

Conservapedia:Guidelines are clear: redundant spamming on talk pages is cause for blocking. [36] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 13:08, March 16, 2025 (EDT)

Is Marco Rubio really a Chinese propagandist?

• Essay: The so-called multipolar world is often mere Chinese propaganda and public relations

• Marco Rubio on multipolarity

We'll never end perpetual war if you allow User:Conservative's spam Essays and Google bombs subverting other users to remain in Mainspace Categories. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:40, March 24, 2025 (EDT)

Alternatively, If you decide to allow the dozens and dozens of Google bombs User:Conservative planted in Mainspace Categories to promote his own ideas and hinder contributions of other editors, he should be required to place the following Template on all Essays in Mainspace Categories:

This is an original essay by User:Conservative. The views expressed in this essay do not reflect the official position of Conservapedia or of any other editor, except where specifically noted.

The wording could be modified to "do not necessarily" reflect.

Examples of this editor's trolling style

First, the editor asked me on the phone what the term "multipolar" meant, which he had no idea. Then over a period of subsequent weeks he created the following Essays:

• Essay:_The_myth_of_multipolarity._What_do_the_terms_unipolar,_bipolar_and_multipolar_mean_as_far_as_international_relations?
• Essay:_The_2023_BRICS_Summit_was_a_bunch_of_hoopla._We_still_don't_live_in_a_multipolar_world.
• Essay:_Why_did_so_many_self-declared_international_relations_experts_miserably_fail_concerning_their_multipolar_fantasy?
• Essay:_The_so-called_multipolar_world_is_often_mere_Chinese_propaganda_and_public_relations

Next, he poisoned the well of Google results by placing them in Mainspace Categories. This was done with malicious intent, as the personal attack in the third Essay makes obvious. He only ever engaged in discussion on talk pages or the phone to gain insight on certain keywords, phrases, and concepts I was working on, beat me to the punch, and poison the well for Google results. And he poisoned the well by using authors and think tanks most all conservative writers would otherwise be critical of.

The man betrayed my efforts to engage in good faith discussion and destroyed my efforts to help him. I have other examples of the same pattern of conduct.

Most importantly, I have repeatedly asked you to intervene and put a stop to this conduct, but the content and anti-Trump foreign policy Google bombs he planted remain in Mainspace Categories, dominating search results while suppressing other editor's contributions.

In fact, you saw for yourself the malicious editing this editor was engaged in when I created the separate Category:Foreign Affairs, and he instantly replicated his Essay content into that Category from Category:International Relations. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 00:08, March 27, 2025 (EDT)

The Topic ban I imposed on his foreign policy editing with your consent for the last half of last year only slowed adding more of his questionable content til after the election. Now that Trump has won, we need to deal with his opinion content linked in Mainspace Categories. It should either be labeled with a Template as his personal views or striped out completely. And this in fairness to all editors of Conservapedia.

Andy,

This editor's malicious trolling content must be disclaimed some way so that other editors can resume creating and adding content. He has abused the privilege you extended to him of adding Essays to Mainspace Categories to pollute those Categories with opinions that are not even his own and to attack and inconvenience other editors. Thank you. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 09:53, March 27, 2025 (EDT)

Vital questions

Question: Will Conservapedia allow an Essay entitled, Essay: Israeli war crimes in Mainspace Categories without identifying the author? Will Conservapedia allow Essays entitled, Essay:Zionists are Nazis, Essay:Israeli Apartheid or Essay:Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu are genocidal maniacs in Mainspace Categories without identifying the author?

This is not a question of censorship or free speech; it is a question of Community Standards, which apparently Conservapedia has none. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:13, March 27, 2025 (EDT)

The Atlantic and Jeffrey Goldberg

Andy,

How do we go about trashing The Atlantic and Journolister Jeffrey Goldberg to try to salvage the Trump Administration 2.0 after User:Conservative, with your consent despite my pleas to put a stop to it, has rehabilitated The Atlantic & Jeffery Goldberg's credibility and reputation?

Thanks. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:34, March 25, 2025 (EDT)

At this point, it does not matter who the mole in the White House is. It is the fact that User:Conservative has restored The Atlantic and Jeffrey Goldberg's credibility, despite the efforts of several editors since the founding of Conservapedia to promote and defend conservativism and conservative values against such trolls as Goldberg. It's not worth the time and effort to chronicle such facts if you continue to allow User:Conservative to troll other editors, preventing them from creating content and updating articles, and take no steps to remove or disclaim his political Essay opinions in Mainspace Categories. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:03, March 25, 2025 (EDT)

the initiation of an Aggressive Undeclared War on Yemen, which the Signal Chat was all about how to properly spin it since what was done was the #1 War Crime of all putting Trump in the same league as Biden/Obama/Bush/Clinton/Reagan. Genocide Don now has his own illegal war. [37]

It is not my intention to cover and/or refute Signalgate since you have allowed User:Conservative to refute more than 10 years of my efforts with Google bombs in Conservapedia, intended to limit my Google results and spew his liberal claptrap in search rankings. Let the warmonger do it himself. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:52, March 25, 2025 (EDT)

Speedy & Double Redirects

Why are Speedy deletes and Double Redirects CONSTANTLY filled up with User:Conservative's crap? It really creates a burden for the rest of us. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 17:36, March 26, 2025 (EDT)

More trolling garbage. There's probably been three or four others like this, occupying a few hours of my time each time since March 26 when I raised this issue with you for at least the second time, limiting my productive editing.

This is one purpose of what usertalk pages are for - to head off these inconveniences. You should mandate User:Conservative to use his communication skills like any other normal editor to ward off his habitual spamming and trolling. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:14, April 2, 2025 (EDT)

And it's been more than a week, and he still hasn't cleaned up his garbage but has continued trolling elsewhere.

This pattern of conduct inhibits other editors from productive editing. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:21, April 5, 2025 (EDT)

Edit war, spamming & trolling

Andy,

As you requested, I am reporting User:Conservative's trolling & spamming activity for several hours this morning, inhibiting my productive editing. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:03, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative obviously is trolling again, wasting several hours of my productive editing time. He has absolutely ZERO understanding of neoconservativism/Straussianism.

Andy,

It simply is not fair that you allow User:Conservative to troll other editors simply because User:Conservative is bored and has run out of ideas to edit on other subjects. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:23, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative again is spamming personal attacks across user pages. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 13:42, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Andy,

Do you really want this outdated neocon warmongering crap on MPL? [38] Trump just lifted sanctions with the Black Sea agreement negotiated in Saudi Arabia.

User:Conservative's trolling is childish, and wastes whole days and weeks of my time. Please restrain him. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:32, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Behold the Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Exchange-traded fund. Uses a "freedom-weighted" strategy to outperform traditional market-weighted emergent market funds by excluding authoritarian regimes like China and Russia.

Behold the Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF. Uses a "freedom-weighted" strategy to outperform traditional market-weighted EM funds by excluding authoritarian regimes like China and Russia.

This fund is achieving superior results by NOT investing in loser/authoritarian economies like China and Russia which are in sad shape right now!

FRDM: Investing In The Free World (No BRICS, Please)!. BRICS vs. emerging market countries that are freer.

Freedom wins again! Conservative (talk) 20:47, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

This is an original essay by User:Conservative. The views expressed in this essay do not reflect the official position of Conservapedia or of any other editor, except where specifically noted.

Oh, Brazil & India are authoritarian now. I had no idea.

(Andy, this is malicious editing). RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:17, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Question: Is Brazil as dynamic and free as the USA! NO!

Brazil's president is the leftist Lula da Silva!

Question: Does India have a lot of corrupt bureaucracy and remnants of the caste system? Is India still a poor country? Yes!

"Despite being outlawed in 1950, remnants of India's caste system, particularly affecting Dalits (formerly "Untouchables"), persist in social structures, housing, employment, and intermarriage, showcasing continued discrimination and segregation."[39]

Also, Corruption in Bureaucracy: A Major Challenge Hindering India's Development.

Once again, RobSmith shows his vast ignorance when it come to international affairs! Conservative (talk) 21:27, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Okay, I'll remember that Jair Bolsonaro and Trump's friend, Modi are authoritarians. The more you talk, the more you sound like Biden, Blinken, and Jake Sullivan. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:33, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Hey, didn't you just cite Palki Sharma & WION on MPL today during your bipolar trolling spamfest? How can we trust media from an authoritarian state? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:38, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Because unlike you, I don't engage in the genetic fallacy. I am not a timid and closed-minded bubble boy who only reads news sources that agree with me 100%!

You thought you control my reading and whined about my reading habits! You thought wrong! And I reject the wrongheaded, bubble boy world of RobSmithism. Conservative (talk) 21:43, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

What makes you think I thought or ever wanted to control your thinking, reading, or brain? Are you paranoid too, in addition to whatever else ails you? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:46, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

P.S. And I love citing news sources from the nonaligned country of India that used to buy a lot more Russian military hardware - until they saw how badly they performed in Ukraine! Big, corrupt, authoritarian and inept Russia is really struggling to win battles against little Ukraine - despite having more manpower and resources! Conservative (talk) 21:49, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

You don't know what "non-aligned" means any more than "multipolarity", "rump state" or any other term you had to ask me what it meant. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:01, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Looking at the Sysop email list, User:Conservative apparently is still in his manic phase. Andy specifically asked you, me, Karajou, and everybody not to engage in the sort of conduct you have engaged in now for about the last 14 hours. Take your pills or see a doctor. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:09, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Dmitry Medvedev has a message for User:Conservative:

• MOSCOW, March 31. /TASS/. Medvedev calls Russia's latest missiles best cure for Russophobia.

The politician said that Russophobia stems from "bipolar affective exaggeration of Russia’s influence on the life of Europe and Europeans" and alternates between manic and depressive phases ...The best therapeutic effect has been observed with the combined use of strong sedative drugs such as Kalibr, Onyx, Iskander and the powerful multi-component tranquilizer Oreshnik. In particularly severe cases, nuclear neuroleptics such as Yars and Sarmat must be used." [40] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:10, April 2, 2025 (EDT)

You have zero members in your Team CP while the CP Civility Association has 9 members.

(A) It's not "my" group. (B) There are more bona fide active participants in Team CP than CP Civility Association. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:23, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

You don't understand interpersonal relations. The idea that a man who does not understand interpersonal relations has a grasp of international relations is a ludicrous and crazy notion! First socks, then shoes! Conservative (talk) 22:15, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Maybe like you studying psychology in an effort to be accepted as "normal", I too spent more time studying international relations than "interpersonal relations" (a politically correct term from the 1970s for retarded people to learn how to function in society). RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:34, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Let me illustrate how retarded you are: you don't see the Marxist rhetoric in a term like Middle-income trap. But hey, all the kids on campus are using it so why not pretend to be smart and go along? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:42, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

"First socks, then shoes." - Former coworker who served as a U.S. Marine

If your so-called Team CP only has you as a member and you have bad interpersonal relations skills, then you surely do not understand international relations.

In fact, as I recall, the entire field of "interpersonal relations" was set up as special ed for retards, And eventually to reduce the stigma, it was integrated into mainstream courses.

See, these are genuine conservative values - to hold onto and preserve the understanding of the human experience of our forefathers, not the newfangled revolutionary and politically correct concepts like "interpersonal relations" or "middle-income trap" to make ourselves sound intelligent. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:15, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

Wow. I would think you'd have way more pride in being cited by the US Justice Department than by Lewis Black. Are you embarrassed about something? RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 22:22, March 28, 2025 (EDT)

This is precisely a big problem with Conservapedia: it is impossible to have a policy discussion or even a discussion on content without the discussion degenerating rapidly into a series of personal attacks by User:Conservative or Brian MacDonald (see Sysop email list) on "politically correct" "interpersonal relations". Why this is is a matter for discussion some other time. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:18, March 29, 2025 (EDT)

Numbers don't lie. The Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF shows that the returns of companies in freedom-loving emergent economies have over 200% the return on investment of authoritarian regimes. Your view of the world failed miserably. St. Putin, Xi Jinping thought and other authoritarian/corrupt "ideals" are failures in economic terms. Your trees produce less fruit so I suggest you chop them up in your mind and throw them in the proverbial fire.

Doggie Due Alert!

Before falling in love with countries, you really should due your due diligence beforehand. Then you wouldn't be so upset when people point out the various flaws of your "pet countries" and your pet theories surrounding them. Conservative (talk) 10:51, March 29, 2025 (EDT)

You have retarded Conservapedia's growth enough. In fact, you put it in reverse. Give your trolling a rest. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 10:54, March 29, 2025 (EDT)

"due your due diligence", lol. I'll have to remember that one. Grammarly is going to strike your narcissistic ego down. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 11:52, March 29, 2025 (EDT)

You need to due your due diligence on due diligence before you step in doggie due again. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:02, March 29, 2025 (EDT)

Goldberg says it’s ‘not true’ that he and Waltz never spoke prior to Signal leak: Full interview

[41] Transparency. It doesn't have to be this painful to call President Trump's judgement into question. But CP editorial management has made it so.

The situation is little different from when you created the Movement conservative article in August 2007, praising John Bolton as 1 of 5 prime representatives and leaders only later having to flip-flop. This calls for discussion of Conservapedia's foreign policy editorial stance at this crucial time, excluding the obnoxious troll User:Conservative. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 14:51, March 30, 2025 (EDT)

You wrote:

“

A movement conservative is one who supports all or nearly all conservative principles with a coherent philosophy, and who advances broad conservative goals both individually and through teamwork...Examples of movement conservatives would include:...United Nations Ambassador John Bolton.

”

and

“

John Bolton is a neocon who became Trump's National Security Adviser after appearing often on television. Bolton's advocacy for foreign wars was never on the same page as Trump's pro-peace approach. But instead of working to advance Trump's superior philosophy, Bolton secretly worked on a self-serving book

”

I trust this clarifies matters.

The troll is at it again from 5AM EDT.

Andy, civility goes beyond interaction on talk pages and email lists. It includes removing crap content from Categories WITHOUT BEING ORDERED by you to do so, so that other editors can resume building those Categories. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:25, March 31, 2025 (EDT)

Mommy! Mommy! User:Conservative is being mean to me again! He keeps vandalizing my page! [42]

He's trolling again

RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:58, April 1, 2025 (EDT)

Still spamming anti-Trump USAID-funded warmongering propaganda. [43]

• Baltic Sea States Aghast At Russian Exclave's Sewage Dumping, Radio Free Europe, 2019. More anti-Trump globalist crap. Judge temporarily bars effort to defund Radio Free Europe, March 25, 2025.

Trump/Musk/Kari Lake want to defund Radio Free Europe because it has been maliciously stirring anti-Russian hate and warmongering in Europe for years, against the American people's interests - a job User:Conservative is only to willing to extend. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 01:34, April 2, 2025 (EDT)

Andy,

User:Conservative has shown an astounding lack of respect for your intelligence. You yourself set the editorial tone for Russia policy, at a time when it was not popular, by commending the Russian stance, in bold face print, against the homosexual agenda. User:Conservative has repeatedly claimed that he brainwashed you to moderate your stance based on the fact that Russia, Greenland, and Alaska do not have sewage systems comparable to Western & Westernized cultures in more temperate climates due to prolonged freezing seasons. He further claimed that due the fact that User:Conservative supposedly identified two gay bath houses in Russia, you no longer think of Russia as a "conservative" country. Therefore, you allowed him to publish and spam his hate screeds that go well beyond the issue of two gay bathhouses in Russia and the fact that water freezes at 32 degrees inside sewage systems under prolonged freezing conditions. To the best of my knowledge, Russia has not elected its version of Bath House Barry yet.

You should be aware of the whispering campaigns and bad feelings User:Conservative evokes when he invokes your name, making you look like an idiot.

He only invokes your name when he can no longer make a coherent or rational argument, which is quite frequent. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 23:58, April 4, 2025 (EDT)

Conservapedia needs to strive for clarity of its conservative message and content, not soley be a platform for vendettas against personal enemies & critics - which User:Conservative has made it from the beginning only because you allowed him, and still allow him, to do it. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 00:29, April 5, 2025 (EDT)

Are these justifiable causes for blocking?

Andy,

Seriously, is "Russia is a declining power and it will only get weaker with time. Russia has a declining population, very low church attendance, an AIDS epidemic and a high level of alcoholism. 20% of Russia doesn't have indoor plumbing" - a justifiable cause for blocking?

User:Conservative habitually misuses his sysop tools to "skillfully drive people nuts" with his narcissistic obsessions with himself, and the value he seems to think he brings to Conservapedia. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 08:06, April 7, 2025 (EDT).

He's spamming and trolling again

[44]

RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 21:16, April 13, 2025 (EDT)

A question

Question: If User: Conservative is malicious, which is something that RobSmith repeatedly claims, then why did User: Conservative score a 95/100 when it comes to compassion on a job application personality test as can be seen below?

Key point: Do not listen to Rob "Gossip Girl" Smith!!! Conservative (talk) 17:10, April 2, 2025 (EDT)

There is little I can add to this narcissistic trolling.

For months now I have been trying to convince User:Conservative that he can't build himself up by tearing other editors down, in the same way that he can't promote his own country by trash talking other nations. See the non-encyclopedic parody Essay: America's sewage system is better than Russia's TERRIBLE sewage system‎‎.

Congrats. He's the only person I ever meet who proudly wears a nations sewage system on his sleeve.

Let me take that back; I'm from Milwaukee and I outta know, we used to have Sewer Socialists there.

Andy, RobSmith is just upset that Russia may merely deliver a 5++ generational fighter jet by 2050 whereas the the USA already has an experimental model of a 6 generational fighter jet and will start production of the 6 generational fighter jets by 2030.[45] The Russians are so far behind the USA when it comes to innovation and technology that Americans can't even see them in their rear view mirrors! Conservative (talk) 18:39, April 2, 2025 (EDT)

More uninformed crap

There are only two things that upset me - your trolling and Andy's refusal to do anything about it.

Senior Admin's trolling impedes productive editing and creation of a Liberation Day or Trump tariff article

Andy, please limit the actions of your troll., Thank you. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 04:25, April 7, 2025 (EDT)

2025: The year of total victory over Personal remark removed

Russia's mortgage rates are approaching 30%. Billionaires are fleeing Moscow and have taken £85bn billion with them.

I hereby declare total victory over User: RobSmithism in 2025!

For more information, please see: Russia's economy is a big mess!

Olé! Olé! Olé!

RobSmith, please contact Andy and tell him if you unconditionally surrender and fully accept my verdict that Putinism is not good for Russia. The evidence is in. Donald Trump has said that Russia's economy is a "disaster" and that Putin needs to end his "ridiculous war". Conservative (talk) 18:03, April 6, 2025 (EDT)

Andy.

Will you please act and do something about this incessant trolling and personal attacks. Thank you.

I hereby challenge [redacted] to a Conservapedia debate. Debate topic: Is Putinism good for Russia?

The gauntlet has been thrown down!

I hereby challenge User: RobSmith to a Conservapedia debate.

Debate topic: Is Putinism good for Russia?

And if RobSmith wishes, it can be a 2 on 1 debate between himself and User: Aschafly vs. User: Conservative.

Some proposed questions during the debate:

1. Why are mortgage rates approaching 30% in Russia? Is it Putin's fault?

2. Why did billionaires in Moscow flee Moscow and why have they taken £85 billion with them?

3. Why did Putin allow himself to get involved in a war of attrition during Russia's demographic crisis which Putin has called an existential threat to Russia?

4. Why did Donald J. Trump call Russia's economy a "disaster"?

5. Why did Donald J. Trump tell Putin to end the "ridiculous war" in Ukraine?

And of course, other questions will be posed.

Please see:

• Russia economy meltdown as bank profits plunge and mortgage rates near 30%

• Russian economy meltdown as billionaires flee Moscow taking £85bn with them

The gauntlet has been thrown down! Will RobSmith accept this public debate at Conservapedia? Conservative (talk) 03:56, April 7, 2025 (EDT)

Answer: The issue of returning 230 billion euros of Russian sovereign assets comes up in June. In the meantime, User:Aschlafly, please restrain your attack dog. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 04:01, April 7, 2025 (EDT)

Spamming a bunch of Western media narratives and propaganda is not "a debate". RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 04:33, April 7, 2025 (EDT)

Conservapedia was founded as an alternative to secular globalist mainstream media narratives and propaganda. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 04:39, April 7, 2025 (EDT)

Given the deteriorating economic conditions of Russia, Russia's apparent continuing great difficulty in expelling Ukrainians from Kursk (which means they are a failed state that cannot control their borders), I suggest you develop a new hobby to replace your hyper-Russophilia. Because if Donald J. Trump imposes secondary sanctions on Russia, due to their unwillingness to end the ridiculous war in Ukraine, Russia's economic deterioration could easily become much worse.

With that being said, I will take my sabbatical from covering international affairs so I can devote more time to covering to studying the topics of Christianity/religion/marketing/promotion/advertising/sales/personal development/peak performance. Conservative (talk) 06:49, April 7, 2025 (EDT)

From one of User:Conservative's favorite globalist sources:

*UK Telegraph: Trump is counting on a quick Ukraine peace deal, leaving Putin rubbing his hands, 06 April 2025.

So User:Conservative can continue with his anti-Trump, pro-Biden foreign policy and sympathy for Nazis.

What User:Conservative does not understand is, the forced mobilizations in Ukraine have exterminated much of the native moderate Ukrainian, ethnic Russian, and Hungarian male populations. The Nazi element has been protected, stronger than ever, and now is more firmly in control of the Zelensky regime than it was at the start of the war. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 07:06, April 7, 2025 (EDT)

User:Conservative: Read the context (before you go on another hours long troll spree): I am citing above one of your favorite pro-globalist, pro-Nazi sources. [46] RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 08:42, April 7, 2025 (EDT)

Another example

Andy,

An example of the consequences of me having to waste 2-4 hours daily (sometimes whole days) dealing with User:Conservative's trolling:

The House just pasted the SAVE Act. [47] Conservapedia has no SAVE ACT article because User:Conservative has wasted hundreds of my hours with his ridiculous trolling. I could cite three more such examples of lead headline stories, just from this morning, where CP has no internal content to link to from MPR due to time wasted by his trolling.

The man has no consideration for the time and efforts of other editors, let alone for our readers who used to come here for information. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 12:59, April 10, 2025 (EDT)

The SAVE Act is an issue that has been talked about for 4 years now. User:Conservative has been on a 3 year-year-long trolling mission to disrupt & impede my editing. His & my editing approach is very, very different. I do not spin out full length articles in a single day. My content is built up over time, as events advance.

Did Jesus eat unleavened bread on Passover - like all other Jews?

I think he did. Am I wrong?Telling (talk) 23:14, April 17, 2025 (EDT)

It's a fascinating issue on which the Gospel of John has a different implication from the synoptic Gospels. Was there a sacrificial lamb, and was the timing right for the meal to be a Passover Seder? Here's one analysis: https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/people-cultures-in-the-bible/jesus-historical-jesus/was-jesus-last-supper-a-seder/ Biblical archaeology].--Andy Schlafly (talk) 12:26, April 19, 2025 (EDT)