User talk:Aschlafly

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Aschlafly's talk page. Please place complaints about other users or other trolling content at Conservapedia:User complaints. If Andy is interested in hearing your complaint, he will respond there. Thank you.

Contents

Topic ban

Please impose a topic ban on User:Conservative's foreign policy and defense related contributions, at least through 2024 primary election season. His deliberate CP:Trolling, "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions" occupies a minimum of 3 hours, and sometimes as much as 6-8 hours of my time DAILY, prohibiting me from making substantive contributions on election and foreign policy matters.

User:Conservative has stated on dozens of occasions, over many years, that he has no interest in politics, and has repeatedly violated his own pledges to cease contributing on those subjects. His contributions are solely and specifically intended to irritate and waste the time of other editors, a violation of CP Commandments and Guidelines.

I have no objection to him contributing on election matters, where he can spew his neocon racist content to his heart's content. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:27, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Andy told you on your talk page: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)"
Andy likes that I create essays (including political essays) - some of which have tens of thousands or thousands of page views. Conservative (talk) 17:43, December 28, 2023 (EST)
I have evidence that you are running a bot on some of your trolling Essays to rack up page views. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)
Disagreeing with you is not trolling. This is not RobSmithPedia. You are not infallible and you are not God. Conservative (talk) 17:52, December 28, 2023 (EST)
(ec) Note: You do not dispute the allegation that you are contributing "neocon racist content" to Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)
Off topic. We are not talking about your atheism content or anything else
And people like my content - especially my atheism article which has the highest page view count article on the website. My articles on homosexuality are very popular too. Conservative (talk) 17:57, December 28, 2023 (EST)

And just because you throw out a spurious and gossipy allegation about me, it does not obligate me to respond. Conservative (talk) 18:00, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Let's examine this edit today User:Conservative calls "motivational": "The only way we can compete with the Eastern Bloc...". The "Eastern Bloc" was a political and military alliance that ceased to exist in 1991. The ideology of the "Eastern Bloc" - communism - was defeated by the Russian Orthodox Church in 1991, yet User:Conservative created another Russophobic cut n paste screed this morning based upon highly dubious, racist, and neocon sources with false, inflammatory, and exaggerated information.

One can only assume User:Conservative is "motivated" by the same racial fear and disdain for the "Slavic hordes" of Eastern Europe that his sources broadcast.RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:14, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Non-responsive
If you have a good case, feel free to create a counteressay. Andy likes content - not talk, talk, talk, talk. Godspeed. Conservative (talk) 18:18, December 28, 2023 (EST)
Your challenges to create counteressays violates the clause of "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users". Your challenges have been answered many times, yet you re-employ that argument.
"Counteressays" would "occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users" in spurious arguments. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:28, December 28, 2023 (EST)
Furthermore, this is precisely why I make this appeal to Andy - your maliciously motivated trolling is an impediment to my creation of content. And your racist, neocon screeds nobody should consider conservative, or acceptable "content" for Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:37, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Conservapedia Essay space should not be a platform for Liberal fascism, and that is all User:Conservative's Geopolitical Essays amount to, not based upon any knowledge or expertise in the area, but rather motivated by spite and a personal vendetta toward another editor. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 13:03, December 29, 2023 (EST)

Andy, Please instruct the trolling Admin to cease and desist. Thank you. [1] RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 15:33, February 27, 2024 (EST)

Can you explain this?

Can you explain what happened with User:BHathorn as far as his recent blocking spree and apparent vandalism of templates?

It seems puzzling given his past editing. He appears to be a longstanding good-faith editor. Maybe if you have the time to look at his past edits that will explain things.

I have a deadline to meet so I don't have time to investigate matters. But via email I did ask you to look into things. Conservative (talk) 07:54, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Please finish the unblocking of people. I did as much unblocking as I could do. Conservative (talk) 07:56, January 4, 2024 (EST)
I am guessing that his password was hacked. I will let you come up with the best solution to solve this issue. User: PeterKa blocked him for a year. I changed the block to 3 days so that gives you time to come up with a solution. I also gave User:BHathorn my Conservapedia email address on his talk page. Conservative (talk) 09:43, January 4, 2024 (EST)
P.S. The User: Conservative account password is unhackable. Rest assured that no hacker will ever hack it! The odds of the dead atheist movement resurrecting is likelier and that is nearly impossible! Conservative (talk) 10:01, January 4, 2024 (EST)
It appears as if there was a hacker who hacked into User:BHathorn's account. The hacker appears to be from a northern state in the USA. I am awaiting hearing a reply from User:BHathorn. Conservative (talk) 10:27, January 4, 2024 (EST)

I unblocked User:BHathorn. He was hacked and he changed his password. I confirmed that the new IP address was from the right editor. Conservative (talk) 10:51, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Re: Thank you

Not a problem. Unfortunately, I was in bed asleep at the time that hacker/vandal managed to seize control of BHathorn's account to go on that vandalism/blocking spree so I didn't get to catch it as it happened, but I did manage to unblock the accounts that had not already been unblocked (including your own) after getting blocked during the vandalism spree. As to the templates that got vandalized (via the vandal putting up that fake message at the top of the page in such a way as to block access to the editing tools as well as the view of the templates themselves), I think those edits should be oversighted to prevent their being shown in the editing history (if I were able to do oversighting myself on those edits, I would, but I don't have Oversight user rights). Northwest (talk) 02:25, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Tremendous work, Northwest, thank you! Oversighting is a great idea for this at a convenient time.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:55, January 5, 2024 (EST)

RINO Of The Year, 2023

Hello Mr. Schlafly,

I am wondering if I could declare Lindsey Graham RINO of the Year. I created the page late this year and there has not been much discussion. However, Lindsey Graham was suggested as being a good pick for RINO of the Year. I hope you had a wonderful Christmas and New Year!

Thank you!--TheNewRight (talk) 23:08, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Yes, terrific choice for the winner of this ignominious award! Please post!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:59, January 5, 2024 (EST)
TheNewRight, I've checked your contribution history. Since the article's creation on Monday, you have made zero effort to reach out to other editors and make sure they at least knew about the article's existence. That's why there hasn't been much discussion. Until now, nobody except you knew about the article's existence.
Now that I myself know about of the article's existence, I will be making my own contributions to the article sometime this weekend. In the meantime, I strongly suggest you start promoting the article on the main talk page so other editors have an opportunity to contribute as well.--Geopolitician (talk) 01:34, January 6, 2024 (EST)

A question.

Is there a reason Sodomy doesn't simply redirect to Sodom? Cazle (talk) 17:09, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Fixed.
User: Cazle, thank for the input. In the future, don't be reticent to take the initiative and fix Conservapedia shortcomings yourself. Conservative (talk) 17:28, January 11, 2024 (EST)
I couldn't, I don't have the necessary permissions. Cazle (talk) 17:33, January 11, 2024 (EST)
Thank you. Cazle (talk) 17:34, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Please give the hacked user account SkipCaptcha ‎permission

Andy, please give the User:BHathorn2 account SkipCaptcha ‎permission.

I appreciate you giving the User:BHathorn this permission, but I actually wanted it for the User:BHathorn2 account. Conservative (talk) 02:35, January 12, 2024 (EST)

I did this correctly as requested, thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:57, January 12, 2024 (EST)
I got my new glasses, but I need to get them fixed. I am awaiting to getting this issue fixed. Bear with me in the meantime! Conservative (talk) 03:02, January 12, 2024 (EST)

Please give this user picture upload rights. I gave him some coaching on the licensing/posting issue

Please give NishantXavier picture upload rights. I gave him some coaching on the licensing/posting issue.

In addition, I will look at some of the pictures he posts to make sure he is doing things right.

Also, I gave him various sources of public domain pictures and Creative Commons type pictures on his user talk pages so he should be able to find lot of pictures. Conservative (talk) 22:25, January 15, 2024 (EST)

Moving article "Achievement related articles" to Essay space

I created a number of very constructive and useful articles and the articles can be seen at:

Andy, User:Conservative is being deceptive right here: I am the editor who had to move this "article" into Essay space. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 07:45, January 21, 2024 (EST)
User:Conservative seems to approve of my improvements. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 07:50, January 21, 2024 (EST)

I did it because there is a war on meritocracy and achievement by liberals and leftists.

Now RobSmith has gone on a temper tantrum and is vandalizing these articles.

I think I need your assistance.

I will call you today about this matter. Conservative (talk) 07:28, January 21, 2024 (EST)

The articles/Essay's are non-collaborative, and the editor refuses to discuss his contributions, despite the fact that the articles/Essays are all about collaboration and teamwork. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 07:31, January 21, 2024 (EST)
He is in fact building more algorithms aimed at suppressing other editor's contributions. Duplicity and maliciousness seem to be his two personal star personal accomplishments - while refusing offers to discuss and collaborate. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 07:38, January 21, 2024 (EST)
Andy, User:Conservative's maliciously motivated trolling is still occupying an inordinate amount of my time and ability to make mainspace contributions. I renew my request that User:Conservative be topic banned from foreign policy and defense related matters. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 08:10, January 21, 2024 (EST)
I will accept User:Conservative's apology at anytime for, once again, casting aspersions upon my real-life name and reputation.
Andy, note: User:Conservative is not "adding content" or "creating content"; he is creating an internal algorithm of uplinks in his latest series "Essay: Achievement related articles" (click on anyone of these "related changes", and they are nothing but external uplinks - no content) to promote himself (and also suppress other editors' contributions).
In his Russophobic series, he has nothing but neocon and globalist uplinks. He did not promote conservativism or conservative ideals, rather was motivated by a personal feud with other editors (as is most of his series on Category:RationalWiki). RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 14:18, January 24, 2024 (EST)
Andy knows that I wrote a pro-isolationist, noninterventionist essay at Conservapedia which is at: [[Essay: Isolationalism is growing in the United States. Is this a good thing?|Isolationalism is growing in the United States. Is this a good thing?]].
You haven't written such an essay. I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself with your nonsensical labeling of me as a neocon. Nobody is buying what you are selling - including Andy.
"There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare." - Sun Tzu. Conservative (talk) 00:43, January 25, 2024 (EST)
All you've written is a bunch of contradictory nonsense - with uplinks to neocon & globalist sources. And by your own admission have no interest in the subject, only an intent to harass people you get into feuds with on the internet, harming CP's reputation as a viable source.
You do not create or add original content; you might occasionally cut n paste a quote from a source, and in the area of foreign affairs you do not have the requisite judgement to discern neocon and globalist sourcing. The idea that you somehow are qualified to write on "collaboration" and "teamwork" is a joke. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:35, January 25, 2024 (EST)

A person who often engages in logical fallacies such as yourself is in no position to accuse others of writing "contradictory nonsense".

[[User: SamHB]] said regarding your unreasonableness: "Now let me get to the point for real. Why do you continue engaging with this person?? ...You have better things to do than bang your head against the wall. - SamHB (talk) 11:49, July 28, 2023 (EDT)".

[[User: Karajou]] told you: "The "we" in your silly posting is just you. You are the one who needed to be civil, but refused to do so the past two years. You returned to this site expecting to take it from Andy, to run it your way, to have everyone follow your brand of rules, and all I'm seeing from this silly posting of yours...." - [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 08:09, October 1, 2023 (EDT)".

Now please feel free to engage in last wordism. Conservative (talk) 01:54, January 25, 2024 (EST)

Andy, as you can see, User:Conservative cannot address issues, he can only quote, verbatim, and carry, personal grudges for a long time. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:01, January 25, 2024 (EST)
If you spent half of the time improving your content writing skills that you engage in picking fights, malignant posting, paranoid accusations, axe-grinding, and envious brooding maybe your content would get more views.
Don't engage in "excusitis" and blame your content's low page views on someone "suppressing your content". Get off the mat and start training! In the next 30 days, I am going to be reading various books on grammar and writing.
"I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.'." - Mohammed Ali. Conservative (talk) 02:13, January 25, 2024 (EST)
More personal attacks. You came here to Andy/talk to accuse me of "vandalizing" a mainspace article you started that I moved to Essay space, which you apparently are quite happy with now. Is that teamwork? is that collaboration? Is that "picking fights, malignant posting, paranoid accusations, or axe-grinding"? RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:29, January 25, 2024 (EST)
Bottomline, and I think Andy will agree with me: malicious editing and motivations, and vendettas ARE NOT conservative values. And that's all I see in your contributions, as per your own words to me more than 10 years ago, beginning with your Atheism article and series, and virtually everything since. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:35, January 25, 2024 (EST)
As to trolling, User:Conservative has severely disrupted my ability since July 2023 to chronical daily war reports (which I had done for 18 months prior with 30 additions to Conservapedia proven right); without a topic ban on User:Conservative writing on foreign policy and defense related issues, I will be unable to make a commitment to chronical the impending conflicts with Iran and China. (And Conservapedia will be at the mercy of the MSM neocon garbage User:Conservative recycles). RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:10, January 28, 2024 (EST)

Something about something or other...

Content disputes/discussions belong on the relevant mainspace talk page(s), not here (See Organizational skills).
More spam
I said that Communist China, which has state atheism, would likely have increasing economic problems and it is headed for decline. And this is currently happening just like I predicted. You on the other hand, as a response to my writings on China, told me to watch to some leftist YouTube video on China which was complete nonsense. I suggest that you do not write about China because you don't know what you are talking about. And your hyper Russophilia clouds many of your views on Russia. Putin picked the wrong party to have a partnership without limits because China is not going to be a magnificant buyer of oil long term - especially since Russia is going to have increasingly higher oil extraction costs in the future. The golden age of Russian oil nears an end. And the West is derisking from China in terms of importing its goods. Conservative (talk) 22:39, January 28, 2024 (EST)

Russian oil: Lower future production and lower future profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies *[https://archive.ph/RzRRI The Golden Age of Russian Oil Nears an End] *[https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/The-Future-of-Russian-Oil-Production-in-the-Short-Medium-and-Long-Term-Insight-57.pdf The Future of Russian Oil Production in the Short, Medium, and Long Term], [https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/the-future-of-russian-oil-production-in-the-short-medium-and-long-term/ Abstract] *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0LzuMUOO0k How Stable Is the Russian Oil Industry?] - Video *[https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Analysts-Predict-42-Decline-In-Russian-Oil-Production-By-2035.html Analysts Predict 42% Decline In Russian Oil Production By 2035] *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Gcl1dO2_0s Russian Oil's Vanishing Act] - video *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQRcvquXJ2Q Crumbling Infrastructure in the Russian Taiga] - video *[https://ogst.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/articles/ogst/full_html/2019/01/ogst190118/ogst190118.html A long-term outlook on Russian oil industry facing internal and external challenges] I trust this clarifies matters. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:|]] [[User talk:|(talk)]]

Nobody was talking to you. You spammed the discussion to confuse Andy so he won't read my request. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:06, January 28, 2024 (EST)
I also predicted that due to the guns vs. butter issue in economics that the Russian civilian sector of the economy would suffer and that it would have long term effects as well. Inflation is high in Russia, the ruble is worth less, there is a labor shortage and now there is a utility/heating crisis in several regions of Russia. See: Russia’s winter troubles: Homes struggling to cope with broken heating systems. Brrr! It's cold in Russia without heat in the winter. Conservative (talk) 23:10, January 28, 2024 (EST)
The issue is not guns and butter, Russia or China, etc.
The issue under discussion right now is your trolling and disruption of my ability to make substantive contributions to mainspace over the past 6 months. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:15, January 28, 2024 (EST)
Content disputes/discussions belong on the relevant mainspace talk page, not here. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:26, January 28, 2024 (EST)

Phyllis Schlafly and her legacy the tradwives are gloriously winning! On behalf of all Christian traditionalists, I hereby declare total victory!

Why Gen Z Is Ditching The Girlboss For The Tradwife, The Federalist, 2024. See also: Traditional gender roles are making a comeback

The tradwives are winning! Another glorious victory by Phyllis Schlafly! First she defeated the Equal Rights Amendment and now this! As much as I hate to do it, on behalf of all Christian traditionalists, I hereby declare total victory!

For details, please see: Essay: Andy Schlafly, Phyllis Schlafly and the Amish. All they do is win against secular leftists (Rap song). Conservative (talk) 10:16, January 25, 2024 (EST)

Upload tag

The new BHathorn2 account needs the Upload tag restored. Thanks. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:04, January 28, 2024 (EST)

I see that you made the Conservapedia obesity article more trim!

In the recent changes log, I just saw this: "Obesity‎; 21:25 . . (-24)‎ . . ‎Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block)‎ (trim, improve further) [rollback 7 edits]."

I got a good laugh out of this edit. You made the Conservapedia obesity article more trim!

Post USA Today and prominent atheists citing my Atheism and obesity article in the beginning of 2011, Conservapedia is known for covering the obesity issue.

It has become a big issue since then (Pardon the pun). In March of 2023, the World Obesity Federation (WOF) released a report stating that by 2035 over 4 billion people – more than half the world’s population – will be obese (see: https://www.uclahealth.org/news/worldwide-obesity-rise).Conservative (talk) 17:31, January 29, 2024 (EST)

Ha ha ha. I appreciate the humor! I'll add that amazing prediction that more than half the world will be obese in a decade.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 17:57, January 29, 2024 (EST)
I just added the material to the obesity article. Conservative (talk) 23:06, January 29, 2024 (EST)
Thank you!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 00:19, January 30, 2024 (EST)

Please ask a Personal remark removed admin to stop harassing me on my talk page because he craves my attention. I stopped reading his messages so its pointless.

User complaints and personal attacks/innuendo do not belong on this page (See Organizational skills, Teamwork skills, Leadership).
Moved to Conservapedia:User_complaints#Please ask a Personal remark removed admin to stop harassing me on my talk page because he craves my attention. I stopped reading his messages so its pointless.

Editor would like his picture uploading rights to be restored

User:BHathorn2 would like his picture uploading rights to be restored. He was able to upload pictures with his previous account. Conservative (talk) 00:39, February 17, 2024 (EST)

Done as requested. Thanks for asking.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 20:24, February 17, 2024 (EST)
OK. I will tell him. Conservative (talk) 20:45, February 17, 2024 (EST)

Who won this debate about future Russian oil production?

Please look at this essay: Talk:Essay: Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies.

If you could be so kind, please give your opinion on who won this debate between User: RobSmith and User: Conservative:

Thanks for all your contributions. Conservative (talk) 15:42, February 27, 2024 (EST)

There was no debate. The conversation degenerated rapidly into a series of personal attacks and User:Conservative's gossip. Furthermore, User:Conservative immediately began spamming personal attacks to multiple editors' pages trying to involve them in his personal disputes, sowing divisiveness.
IMO, User:Conservative is just bored (having completed his homosexual & atheism series), and just wants to stir up controversy and division. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 15:45, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Although I did respond to some RobSmith nonsense/deflection, most of the debate was on the issue itself.
And RobSmith lacked any adequate response to my points when pressed in the debate. His denialism and handwaving was so inadequate that he tried to delete a portion of the debate.
Russia is likely going to be in very bad shape in about 10 years due to its lower oil production. The sooner RobSmith comes to grip with this matter, the lesser he will be greatly disappointed later on.
In short, his hyper Russiaphilia/Putinism is built on sand. Conservative (talk) 17:03, February 27, 2024 (EST)
P.S. I sent a copy of this message via email to you and other Conservapedians. Conservative (talk) 17:04, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Take your meds. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:54, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Here's your sources (we've been over this 10k times):
  • Stratfor - a CIA front;
  • Oilprice.com - an investment advisory newsletter and trade publication;
  • Moscow Times - another CIA front.
None of them can be regarded as unbiased, factual reporting. User:Conservative is incapable of discussing sourcing without resorting to personal attacks and harassing other editors to get involved in his problems. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:59, February 27, 2024 (EST)

RobSmith, the self-described "aesthete in the art of rhetoric and discourse" (See: Conservapedia influential editors and users ), continues to desperately hide terrible debate performance concerning his debate about the essay Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies which indicates that Russian oil production will likely fall by about 40% within the next 11 years due to extraction cost, labor shortages, etc. and I use the source OilPrice.com, a Russian news outlet, etc. to support this contention. This would be a huge development since Russia still does not have a well-diversified economy and is very dependent on oil/gas sales.

You can see his lame attempt to hide this matter at Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies"

Previously, RobSmith wrote about his work at: Essay:the nobsian method

"You are and I'll put it in the Acknowledgements. If everything goes right, hopefully it'll stand next to the Dialogues of Plato, Socratic method, and Machiavelli Discourses in classrooms someday. nobs 00:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)"

But this is simply not true. A person who is obviously wrong about something admits it and doesn't engage in obfuscation, denialism and go to extreme measures to hide this.

That's the problem with RobSmith, he is trying to foist a false narrative about himself, Russia and Putin at Conservapedia. Conservative (talk) 22:18, February 27, 2024 (EST)

A discussion page is not a "debate" page. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:49, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Reflects the impact of User:Conservative's persistent trolling over the past year and my efforts to counter it.

User:Conservative has successfully taken me away from my sources reporting on Russiagate, the Russia hoax, and several other projects culminating in the Ukraine war. I was unable to write on the momentous events recently on the fall of Avdiivka, and its implications, because of his relentless trolling, occupying whole days at times. His re-cycled Hillary Clinton/Deep State Russia Russia Russia crap should be banned from Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:32, February 27, 2024 (EST)

What's important is for the wiki links from MPR go to updated, important information. However, User:Conservative occupies entirely too much of my time to make substantive contributions, being forced to discuss his bad sourcing which only meet his confirmation bias. When he cannot make an adequate defense of his sourcing, he resorts to personal attacks, and tries to organize lynch mobs among Conservapedia editors, sowing division. He has used this method for well over a decade. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:45, February 27, 2024 (EST)

RobSmith, when you dig yourself a big hole, it is a best practice to stop digging.
Also, I never asked you to post lame attempts to rebut my essays on the talk pages of my essays. You decided to do this. But I did suggest writing counter essays which is something you largely did not do.
Due to your poor analytical/forecasting abilities you have been wrong about China, Putin, Russia and Russia's likely future prospects. But I did offer you some suggestions and resources on how to get better at this.
RobSmith, you wrote: ""Fascism is both socialism and capitalism; and User:Conservative is glad to have Karajou back to defend User:Conservative's brand of "capitalism". RobSGive Peace a Chance! 22:06, October 2, 2023 (EDT)"
RobSmith, it's time you embrace our brand of capitalism. If you can't beat them, join them. Because China and Russia are probably heading for a world of hurt due to their bad public policies and corruption. Conservative (talk) 22:54, February 27, 2024 (EST)
The United States is a mixed economy. Pure capitalism leads to pure chaos, as we would basically have a collection of mini corporate nation-states. Socialism is evil, period. If you are talking about a pro-state, state-mandated, state-regulated, state-endorsed, anti-individual, anti-freedom form of capitalism, then you could "technically" say that particular form of pseudo "capitalism" is fascism. Cazle (talk) 01:36, February 28, 2024 (EST)
That's interesting, but that's not the subject under discussion here. Trust me, you don't want to get involved in this mess. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:54, February 28, 2024 (EST)
Note: I wrote 9,000+ bytes of CP's 13,000+ Capitalism article, more than 15 years ago drawn extensively from Adam Smith. All that's been added to the article since is a lengthy list of Quotes and two small sections on Cold War propaganda. If User:Conservative has a disagreement with my presentation or views on Capitalism, he should make changes or additions in the mainspace, or begin a discussion on the article talk page. But I am getting very tired of User:Conservative (an oxymoronic user name) incessant trolling and personal attacks across CP article pages, on CP editor user pages, and in off-wiki private email lists. I will do what I can, with the powers granted to me as an Admin, to reign his incivility, trolling, abuses, and the horrible example he makes to editors of proper conduct as both an Administrator and Editor. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 04:53, March 4, 2024 (EST)
If you don't know what a talk page is for, what can I say?
If you don't know what fascism is, go back to school. Or read Hayek. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:59, February 27, 2024 (EST)
And the field of international relations is not a field where bigots like Antony Blinken and User:Conservative are allowed to run rampant. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:02, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Andy, Please. He's been trolling us and several editors in their private email all day and evening. Please intervene and tell him to desist. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:16, February 28, 2024 (EST)

Throwing down the gauntlet: A challenge to the man who denies that Russia will have an extremely hard time staffing its oil and gas fields in coming years

Trolling (see email discussion)
Silver-gauntlet-no-splash-md.png

The Oreanda-News agency was founded in August 1994 in Moscow, becoming one of the first independent news agencies in contemporary Russia. Since 2007, it has been based in Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Please read: In Russia, the shortage of personnel in the oil and gas industry was assessed, Oreana News, 2023

RobSmith, you wrote about oil/gas industry skills and Russia currently being short 25,000 people: "Between now and 2035, there is 88% of the population of planet Earth who can step up, learn the job skills, and occupy those positions."

A lot of the remaining Russian oil/gas expertise in Russia is old and about to retire and young Russians are not stepping up to replace those people enough as Oreana News and others have stated. Also, a lot of the expertise that Russia used to deal with was from the Western oil companies and now Russia has bad relations with the West. Furthermore, in terms of legal immigration, people are not flocking to Russia. In fact, Russia has a brain drain now.

So people who are knowledgeable about future Russian oil/gas production, such as the people at OilPrice.com, are not optimistic.

Your denialism as exhibited by your magic wand waving on the likelihood that Russia will solve this problem is unrealistic and fantasy. You are wishcasting to the nth degree. If the problem was so easy for Russia to fix, Russia would have solved it by now and not be short of 25,000 oil/gas workers. But the problem is getting worse and not better.

So down the pike, like in about 10 years or so (or sooner), it looks like you are going to have to replace Russians/Putin with some other person/group as far as your grossly idealized/unrealistic portrayal of them. Because it looks like Russia is going to be in bad shape in about 10 years or so. But I would suggest worshipping God instead of mere men.

RobSmith, I am giving you a challenge: Give me one credible source that says that Russia is likely going to help solve its expected significantly lower future oil production by 2035 by finding sufficient labor to solve this issue. Just one credible source. I don't expect you being able to do this because I don't expect many people sharing your fantasy. But even if Russia did not manage to achieve this feat, Russian oil is still going to be significantly harder to extract and less profitable to extract. Conservative (talk) 03:00, February 28, 2024 (EST)

Breaking: Media and User:Conservative Revives Russia Hysteria for 2024 Election.
Since 2005, Greenwald has lived in Rio de Janeiro with his (same sex) husband, David Miranda, who is now a (Brazilian) Federal Congressman representing Rio state. In 2017, Greenwald and Miranda adopted two sibling children from Maceió.
from Glenn Greenwald#Personal. I take that you support GloboHomo and child abuse/predation??? Cazle (talk) 01:21, March 3, 2024 (EST)
No, I don't. What specific criticism of his reporting as a journalist do you have? RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 05:15, March 4, 2024 (EST)
CP:Trolling: "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions".
Andy, please put a stop to this. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 03:08, February 28, 2024 (EST)

March 1, 2024

Andy, look at this. Look at User:Conservative's edits for March 1, 2024.

After trolling multiple editors in their private email with personal attacks on another editor, he spends hours and hours yesterday removing the evidence of a pointless dispute he started months ago at the heart of his trolling.

No one said he can't hold anti-Russia or anti-China views; the question is, Why now? Why is he engaged in such pro-globalist warmongering in this election year? His timing is atrocious. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 11:24, March 1, 2024 (EST)

I saw your post about Japan's demographic crisis

I saw your post about Japan and its demographic crisis.

I think it's time for the Amish or quiverful Christians to move to Japan. It would be a win-win situation! Conservative (talk) 00:59, March 3, 2024 (EST)

Great idea! There are Amish communities in Canada and South America!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 03:49, March 3, 2024 (EST)

In-site copying duplication on a website is not good

Andy, look at this: [2][3]

The United States has a huge national debt (See: National debt of the United States) and it saw a major spike in the amount of its national pandemic during the pandemic and during the post pandemic

Does this make any sense to you?

He'll copy paste the same nonsense into at least 2 dozen more pages, only to poison the well for the search term "triumphalism", as he has been doing with virtually all new search terms I introduce into CP since last July 2023. I'm close to giving up adding new content. He has totally derailed my efforts to report on two major ongoing wars. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 04:56, March 9, 2024 (EST)

An admin is deleting a bunch of my essays because he cannot effectively respond to them using evidence and logic. Have him create counter essays like a conservative would do

The Admin User: RobSmith is deleting a bunch of my essays because he cannot effectively respond to them using evidence and logic.

Andy, you told RobSmith concerning my essays: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)" Conservative (talk) 00:59, March 10, 2024 (EST)

An Admin is engaged in relentless trolling.
His Essays are copy pastes of previous entries, devoid of content. As Andy just said,
  • let's reduce the in-site copying as duplication on a website is not good. Thanks!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:13, March 8, 2024 (EST)
The essays are replete with snide comments in the title directed at me or the subject I'm working on. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:09, March 10, 2024 (EST)
I renew my request for a topic ban on User;Conservative's alleged "geopolitical" and "international relations" nonsensical trolling.
Trolling is defined as impeding another editors' productive efforts; I have not been able to work on the Ukraine series since before the fall of Avdiivka because of this daily nonsense that occupies hours and hours of my time. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:18, March 10, 2024 (EST)
RobSmith, just be honest and say that you are upset about my 15 point essay at: Essay: Russia is not a conservative country.
If you take issue with this essay, please write a counter essay at Essay: Russia is a conservative country. Godspeed. Conservative (talk) 01:20, March 10, 2024 (EST)
I haven't even read it. I know it's a response the Liberal triumphalism, which is a bunch of crap you wrote I'm trying to rewrite and make sense of.
Andy, this right here -> " Have him create counter essays " is a point blank admission of trolling, i.e., intending to occupy and control my time with BS and impede productive editing on daily reports from the Ukraine war. 01:24, March 10, 2024 (EST)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RobSmith (talk)
I'm not interested in writing what he calls "counter essays". All I want to do is keep the NATO war in Ukraine series current. But with censorship by Big Tech and the intel community, language barriers, time zone differences and lag times, it requires my full intention. I am not using my productive energies to debate politics in war time.
User:Conservative takes various concepts I introduce, such as geopolitics, international affairs, international relations, multipolarity, and now triumphalism - words and concepts he never heard before, has ZERO understanding of - googles the term, creates an Essay full of CFR BS from authors he has no idea who they are, to explain what the neocon/globalist meaning of the term is - while calling it "American". It's sickening, especially since hundreds of people are dying everyday as he fans the flames with war rhetoric.
In User:Conservative's warped, twisted mind, he confuses respect with affection. Because I respect Russian culture and the Russian military, in his warped twisted mind he thinks that's affection (like being seduced by a 300lb. fat Slavic woman). RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 05:58, March 10, 2024 (EDT)
Read his crap, like his latest 12 points on why Russians deserve to die. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 06:07, March 10, 2024 (EDT)
Look at my Obamagate series - that took 5 years to write in daily installments. It is a definitive contemporaneous historical document, devoid of MSM fake news. User:Conservative has massively disrupted my war diary for the past 7 months - on a subject he is not even interested in. He has targeted me personally with his vindictive attitude for simply exposing the fact that he had absolutely no interest in geopolitics and world affairs when the war broke. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 06:29, March 10, 2024 (EDT)
I predicted communist China's current state of economic troubles, while you took the leftist position that things were ok in China and asked me to watch a leftist video.
Also, it's obvious to me and others that you are a self-described "aesthete in the art of rhetoric and discourse" who can't put together counter essays using facts, evidence and logic.
You wrote: ""It won't happen until China and Russia break the back of US domination, first. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 21:53, August 14, 2023 (EDT)" So it's not surprising to me that you embrace the Chinese propaganda that we live in a multipolar world when we do not. See: The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations? and Essay: The so-called multipolar world is often mere Chinese propaganda and public relations.
Some people are susceptible to propaganda because they naively think it confirms their false wishes. Others take a more investigative approach and gather various pieces of facts and evidence so they can make sound arguments. Conservative (talk) 09:09, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

I wish you were less obsessed with me and didn't post messages on the talk pages of my essays that I now rarely read. But that is your problem and not mine. Your user page is obsessed with me. Thank God my user page is not obsessed with someone as uninteresting as you. Conservative (talk) 09:30, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

Well, well, well, the rivalry between spiritual gonorrhea and syphilis over here still perpetually rages, eh? —LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 09:48, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

The sheer hypocrisy of the original complainer in this section

Just a few years ago, RobalaamSmith had zero problem with straight-up verbatim copy/pasting content I wrote and plastering them in other articles with zero re-wording.

Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel!

—Matthew 23:24

The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.

—Ecclesiastes 1:9

LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 09:46, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

Please join this new debate page

Debate: Is Codex Vaticanus superior in reliability to the Textus ReceptusLT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 10:08, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

An admin is trying to hide his gross incompetence when it comes to international relations

RobSmith is trying to hide his incompetence when it comes to international relations.

Below is a copy of this matter which can be found HERE.

If China allows private ownership of real estate, they are not really communist, are they? RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 12:22, February 19, 2024 (EST)

Note: User:Conservative forged my electronic signature above in one of his hasty trolling rants. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:53, March 17, 2024 (EDT)

Spam. We've heard it a thousand times.
In communist China, which has state atheism, the government owns the urban land under urban buildings.[4] And in China, they have one-party rule and its the Chinese Communist Party. And this rule is not very good. See: Essay: The rising rule of communist idiocracy in China
RobSmith you wrote: "IOWs, if you don't have anything positive to say about socialists and communists, just shut up, at least for the duration of the war. Read the bios of Bill Donovan, Frank Knox, and Henry Stimson. And if you don't know what I'm talking about, you especially need to just shut up. RobSGive Peace a chance 17:54, January 21, 2023 (EST)"
RobSmith, since Russia has been so dependent on selling oil to China recently, why do you know so little about China? Aren't you Conservapedia's resident international relations expert? Your reply partly explains why you are so adamant about stifling debate and why you endeavor to censor information. Conservative (talk) 05:38, March 13, 2024 (EDT)
Rob, if "they are not really communist", why do they call themselves the Chinese Communist Party? NishantXavierFor Christ the King 06:44, March 13, 2024 (EDT)
In the midst of the communist Xi Jinping's personality cult that honors Mao Zedong, RobSmith incompetently says that China is "not really communist" (See: China’s Xi Jinping to pay homage at Mao mausoleum amid fears of new personality cult, December 2023, Radio Free Asia and China resolution enshrining Xi scraps ban on 'personality cults', Nikkei Asia, 2021 and Creating the Cult of Xi Jinping: The Chinese Dream as a Leader Symbol, Cornell International Affairs Review).
This is incompetence of biblical proportions. And he wonders why people challenge his self-proclaimed international relations expertise. Conservative (talk) 13:33, March 13, 2024 (EDT)

When people make big mistakes, they should acknowledge it and not try to hide it. 14:08, March 13, 2024 (EDT)

  • (A) I wrote the Chinese Communist Party, Xi Jinping and Mao Zedong articles cited here;
  • (B) I have never EVER EVER EVER discussed the Chinese economy with User:Conservative anywhere, onsite, in private email or phone conversation, and do not intend to.
  • (C) This is trolling of Biblical proportions. Please rein in your attack dog or put a choke collar on him or sumpthin. Thnx. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:53, March 17, 2024 (EDT)
Andy
I need quick action on my request for a topic ban. User:Conservative once again is violating CP Commandments and Guidelines by spamming personal attacks across user pages. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 14:25, March 13, 2024 (EDT)

The Emmanuel Macron article and articles about other prominent political figures

Please take a look at the talk page history of the Emmanuel Macron article at Talk:Emmanuel Macron.

I made a good argument that the allegation that Macron's wife is a transexual was a spurious allegation that has no business being in the second section of the article plus an excellent case that the lede section is poor the article which is preventing it from reaching the 100,000 page view threshold at this time. So many of our articles about prominent political figures now have poor lede paragraphs and sections which is artificially suppressing the traffic to the website. Conservative (talk) 19:30, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Andy,
De-sysop him. His relentless, malicious, trolling and inability to do basic research and work with others without crying to you like a baby is out of control.
This is the same guy who spends months and months writing about gay atheists and their French Fry eating, naming them by name, or makes a big deal on the Obama page about Michelle Obama eating a 2,400 calorie burger (which isn't even in her current bio). Now he complains about worldwide MSM reporting stories that may offend a globalist warmonger. Topic ban. Or de-sysop. Now. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:45, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
NYPost thought it was worthy reporting: Mar 9, 2024: French President Emmanuel Macron, 46, fires back for first time at claims wife, 70, was born a man. User:Conservative is trolling both you and me, preventing both of us from productive editing while he writes screeds about how Russia should be criticized because it is LESS tolerant of gay rights than the United States. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:55, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
Andy,
He's got you bamboozled into thinking he's an SEO expert. He's not. All he's done is run robots on his pages to promote himself and suppress other's contributions.
He's led you to believe that Homosexuality and bestiality is of more popular interest on a conservative website than Phyllis Schlafly. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:09, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
Andy, I am no fan of Richard Dawkins who is far less prominent figure than Emmanuel Macron that I am also not a fan of. And yet, the far less prominent figure of Richard Dawkins was able to have a 1,500,000 page view article at Conservapedia (As you know, the view counter was accidentally reset which caused the article to lose 500,000 page views on the counter), but the Macron article on a prominent political figure has yet to hit near 100,000 page views.
Your page views are inorganic plus a bunch of leftist trolls you constantly bait to vandalize Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:18, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
Why is this so? The article calls Macron a fascist in the lede section despite that this is highly improbable given that his nation was overrun by German fascists in WWII. In addition, the lede has a hyper partisan, speculative tone/material in the lede one of which is a link to a dead forum link. In the second section of the article rather than having evergreen content, has some gossipy allegation that Macron is married to a transexual (Donald Trump, who is married, owned a beauty pageant and is known for his woman chasing past, said Macron's wife had a nice figure on a visit to France. Conservative (talk) 20:13, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
Here's the problem right here: instead of fixing the problem, he comes whining here like a little brat. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:19, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Robsmith, you wrote above: "Your page views are inorganic".

Social media shares for Conservapedia's atheism article: Screen capture taken on November 3, 2017 from the website Sharedcount.com:

Social media shares for Conservapedia's atheism article. The above graphic is a screen capture taken on November 3, 2017 from the website Sharedcount.com

The Conservapedia atheism article has been shared at the Freedom From Atheism Foundation Facebook page.

RobSmith, you can say until you are blue in the face that "Your page views are inorganic", but I have a screen share from Sharedcount.com indicating that Conservapedia's atheism article, which I largely wrote, was shared at least 6K times at Facebook which is only one of several social media websites. In addition, it has been repeatedly been cited by Shockofgod on YouTube plus elsewhere.

Andy believes that Conservapedia's atheism article is its most popular article. And he has the server logs and other data backing this up. Conservative (talk) 02:06, March 17, 2024 (EDT)

317 shares on gay talk forums you trigger to vandalize CP doesn't add up to 7 million. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:09, March 17, 2024 (EDT)
Well, you welcome to assert until your blue in the face that my view counts are not organic, but sharedcount.com doesn't lie. Andy is a Harvard Law School trained lawyer and good lawyers respect proof and evidence.
"You teach yourselves the law, but I train your minds. You come in here with a skull full of mush; you leave thinking like a lawyer." - Charles W. Kingsfield Jr., The Paper Chase (1973).[5] Conservative (talk) 02:22, March 17, 2024 (EDT)
Let's do the math: 7,000,000 / (6k + 371 + 6.3) = 522, meaning each share generated 522 hits outside of Lewis Black giving you a nod. Impressive. Now, I know you keep figures on global atheism. It would be interesting to see how many (whom you singlehandedly defeated and are non-existent now) visited CP, or maybe how many times each one did to rack up 7 million (being they are so few in number).
Oh, and the plug you got from Lewis Black must've been like a Billy Graham Crusade, with thousands coming forward to give their lives to Christ. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:46, March 17, 2024 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&oldid=2034840"