Difference between revisions of "Talk:Claptrap"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(usage data) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I've therefore reverted "neoconservative" to "right-wing" and restored "religious" | :I've therefore reverted "neoconservative" to "right-wing" and restored "religious" | ||
:--[[User:DHouser|DHouser]] 13:50, 27 January 2013 (EST) | :--[[User:DHouser|DHouser]] 13:50, 27 January 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Impefect indeed. Lots of liberal newspapers and blogs that few people read, and even fewer are helped by. Conservatives do not seek attention, or engage in pretension, so the term "claptrap" has no application to them.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:07, 27 January 2013 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:07, January 27, 2013
Usage
Just looking at frequency of usage (based on the imperfect approach of using Google search counts):
- "liberal claptrap": 9,700 hits
- "religious claptrap": 38,000 hits
- "atheist claptrap": 812 hits
- "right-wing claptrap": 155,000 hits
- "neoconservative claptrap": 732 hits
- I've therefore reverted "neoconservative" to "right-wing" and restored "religious"
- --DHouser 13:50, 27 January 2013 (EST)
- Impefect indeed. Lots of liberal newspapers and blogs that few people read, and even fewer are helped by. Conservatives do not seek attention, or engage in pretension, so the term "claptrap" has no application to them.--Andy Schlafly 15:07, 27 January 2013 (EST)