Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add article to help our readers understand how to read some of the articles that appear in liberal claptrap (and also some on our main page))
 
(wl)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Betteridge<nowiki>'</nowiki>s law of headlines''' states that [[headline]]s that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".<ref>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2009/02/techcrunch-irresponsible-journalism.html</ref>
+
'''Betteridge<nowiki>'</nowiki>s law of headlines''' states that [[headline]]s that end with a [[question mark]] can be safely answered "no".<ref>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2009/02/techcrunch-irresponsible-journalism.html</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}

Revision as of 03:44, March 31, 2013

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

References