Difference between revisions of "User talk:PeterKa"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:40, 22 December 2013 (EST)
 
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:40, 22 December 2013 (EST)
 
:I rewrote the opening and added additional material. Tell me what you think. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 21:20, 1 January 2014 (EST)
 
:I rewrote the opening and added additional material. Tell me what you think. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] 21:20, 1 January 2014 (EST)
 +
 +
==Taiwan==
 +
Contents of Republic of China article moved to [[Taiwan]]; please make necessary corrections as you see fit.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:11, 7 January 2014 (EST)

Revision as of 06:11, January 7, 2014

We don't allow copying from other sources, unless the contributor wrote the material that was published at the other source. Are you the original author of No Gun Ri?--Andy Schlafly 23:50, 15 December 2013 (EST)

Yes. I am. The material was on Wikipedia years ago. But the current No Gun Ri article is quite different. PeterKa 00:02, 16 December 2013 (EST)
OK, thanks for your answer.--Andy Schlafly 09:26, 16 December 2013 (EST)
It is the same story with Roman Warm Period. I wrote it a while back for Wikipedia, but later a liberal editor came along and revised the POV. PeterKa 20:33, 16 December 2013 (EST)

Nuclear option

I see that I may have disparaged your writing style. No offense was intended. You made a great improvement to an earlier version. It seems that we each have our pet peeves: you believe a definition shouldn't say what some people may think about the consequences of something; it should say what that something is. And I have a peeve about "when". Other than that, you write well. SamHB 22:40, 22 December 2013 (EST)

I rewrote the opening and added additional material. Tell me what you think. PeterKa 21:20, 1 January 2014 (EST)

Taiwan

Contents of Republic of China article moved to Taiwan; please make necessary corrections as you see fit. Karajou 01:11, 7 January 2014 (EST)