Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: The question atheists fear"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The reason I propose this is "evidence" and "proof" are pretty much the same thing. Likewise, "accurate" and "correct". Do the extra words add something I'm not seeing here? | The reason I propose this is "evidence" and "proof" are pretty much the same thing. Likewise, "accurate" and "correct". Do the extra words add something I'm not seeing here? | ||
| + | ::Proof and evidence are not synonymous. For example, logical proofs. [[Greg Bahnsen]] utterly defeated atheist Gordon Stein by demonstrating that atheism/naturalism/materialism cannot account for the existence of logic. Stein was clearly rattled in the debate and became nervous. To this day, the atheist community cannot defeat Bahnsen's argument. See also: [[Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate]] | ||
| + | |||
::Atheists are hardheaded and often very narcissistic. No doubt Shockofgod added the emphasis for that reason - so the message would get through. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:43, 13 January 2014 (EST) | ::Atheists are hardheaded and often very narcissistic. No doubt Shockofgod added the emphasis for that reason - so the message would get through. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:43, 13 January 2014 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:34, January 13, 2014
Could we cut down the question?
Instead of this: "What proof and evidence do you have that proves that atheism is accurate and correct?"
Why not a more concice version: "What proof is there for atheism?"
The reason I propose this is "evidence" and "proof" are pretty much the same thing. Likewise, "accurate" and "correct". Do the extra words add something I'm not seeing here?
- Proof and evidence are not synonymous. For example, logical proofs. Greg Bahnsen utterly defeated atheist Gordon Stein by demonstrating that atheism/naturalism/materialism cannot account for the existence of logic. Stein was clearly rattled in the debate and became nervous. To this day, the atheist community cannot defeat Bahnsen's argument. See also: Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate
- Atheists are hardheaded and often very narcissistic. No doubt Shockofgod added the emphasis for that reason - so the message would get through. Conservative 15:43, 13 January 2014 (EST)