Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+1)
(→‎Possible examples: +1 from MPR)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
*[http://www.parkridgeattorney.com/2014/02/25/lots-lawyer-jokes-arbitrator-jokes/ "Mandatory Arbitration: Friend of Big Business and Enemy of Consumers?"]
 
*[http://www.parkridgeattorney.com/2014/02/25/lots-lawyer-jokes-arbitrator-jokes/ "Mandatory Arbitration: Friend of Big Business and Enemy of Consumers?"]
 
*[http://abcnews.go.com/Business/companies-voiding-sue-facebook/t/story?id=23363842 "Do Companies Void Your Right to Sue If You 'Like' Them on Facebook?"]
 
*[http://abcnews.go.com/Business/companies-voiding-sue-facebook/t/story?id=23363842 "Do Companies Void Your Right to Sue If You 'Like' Them on Facebook?"]
 +
*"Is the BLM breaking the Constitution?"
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}

Revision as of 17:56, May 10, 2014

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References