Difference between revisions of "Talk:There Are No Atheists In Foxholes"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Mwhite (talk) to last revision by Ed Poor)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army...
 
So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army...
 +
 +
I am going to add in here that the Battle of Stalingrad was fought by an explicitly atheistic army. [[User:Basel|Jros83]]

Revision as of 19:35, June 2, 2014

What's the point of this, aside from being an ad homenim attack on atheists? JecklynH 02:03, 16 June 2008 (EDT)

That IS the point. Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army...

I am going to add in here that the Battle of Stalingrad was fought by an explicitly atheistic army. Jros83