Difference between revisions of "Talk:There Are No Atheists In Foxholes"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎stalingrad: new section)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
I am going to add in here that the Battle of Stalingrad was fought by an explicitly atheistic army. [[User:Basel|Basel]]
 
I am going to add in here that the Battle of Stalingrad was fought by an explicitly atheistic army. [[User:Basel|Basel]]
 +
 +
== stalingrad ==
 +
 +
State atheism was not very effective in Russia: [http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/Z3211C.pdf Forced Secularization in Soviet Russia: Why an Atheistic Monopoly Failed]. It is doubtful that a high percentage of the Russian troops in Stalingrad were atheists. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:51, 2 June 2014 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:51, June 2, 2014

What's the point of this, aside from being an ad homenim attack on atheists? JecklynH 02:03, 16 June 2008 (EDT)

That IS the point. Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army...

I am going to add in here that the Battle of Stalingrad was fought by an explicitly atheistic army. Basel

stalingrad

State atheism was not very effective in Russia: Forced Secularization in Soviet Russia: Why an Atheistic Monopoly Failed. It is doubtful that a high percentage of the Russian troops in Stalingrad were atheists. Conservative 15:51, 2 June 2014 (EDT)