Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chess"
MountainDew (talk | contribs) |
Rob Pommer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
A section on chess notation would be excellent! [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 16:18, 15 April 2007 (EDT) | A section on chess notation would be excellent! [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 16:18, 15 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Image== | ||
| + | I like the shot of the individual pieces; can it be flipped, R-L? that way the text will correspond more naturally with the photo; conversely we can rev the text. Your call.[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 16:20, 15 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:20, April 15, 2007
My gosh, there is no context given for the second half of the article, not describing what the pieces are. --Hojimachongtalk 12:41, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- What's the source on the pieces being added? Curious to read more.-AmesGyo! 15:26, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
I'll get on it. By the way, is anybody interested in playing email chess? MountainDew 17:13, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
- RedHotPawn, same username.-AmesGyo! 17:14, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
I'll do the email chess MD;
ON Topic: we're going to need diagrams for to spell out moves and strategies, as chess is such a visual game. I don't have a clue where to get them though. Also a section on chess notation would be handy. Crackertalk 16:14, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
I'm kansaspatzer if anyone is on Gameknot.
A section on chess notation would be excellent! MountainDew 16:18, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
Image
I like the shot of the individual pieces; can it be flipped, R-L? that way the text will correspond more naturally with the photo; conversely we can rev the text. Your call. Crackertalk 16:20, 15 April 2007 (EDT)