Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+1)
m (fix link)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
*[http://abcnews.go.com/Business/companies-voiding-sue-facebook/t/story?id=23363842 "Do Companies Void Your Right to Sue If You 'Like' Them on Facebook?"]
 
*[http://abcnews.go.com/Business/companies-voiding-sue-facebook/t/story?id=23363842 "Do Companies Void Your Right to Sue If You 'Like' Them on Facebook?"]
 
*"Is the BLM breaking the Constitution?"
 
*"Is the BLM breaking the Constitution?"
−
*[http://consumerist.com/2007/07/23/are-aribitrators-punished-by-credit-card-companies-for-ruling-in-favor-of-the-consumer/ "Are Aribitrators [''sic''] Punished By Credit Card Companies For Ruling In Favor Of The Consumer?"]
+
*[http://consumerist.com/2007/07/23/are-aribitrators-punished-by-credit-card-companies-for-ruling-in-favor-of-the-consumer/ "Are Aribitrators <nowiki>[</nowiki>''sic''<nowiki>]</nowiki> Punished By Credit Card Companies For Ruling In Favor Of The Consumer?"]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}

Revision as of 19:35, June 22, 2014

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References