Changes

165 bytes added ,  15:28, June 30, 2014
Line 145: Line 145:  
:I think it should be "the Son, a human being," unless the context indicates otherwise.  It would be great if you could update the other instances of "Son of Man."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:01, 29 June 2014 (EDT)
 
:I think it should be "the Son, a human being," unless the context indicates otherwise.  It would be great if you could update the other instances of "Son of Man."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:01, 29 June 2014 (EDT)
   −
::I advise against such a substitution, futilely, I suppose. But the only justification for this phrase is that Andy likes it, he hasn't come up with ''anything'' resembling a fact, an example for this use of the genitive, etc. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:27, 29 June 2014 (EDT)
+
::Thanks for the reply! I think I've managed to correct all instances of the term in Gospel of John (if there's something I missed than somebody please let me know), Soon I'll begin working on the removing the term from our translation of Gospel of Mark. Should the use of the phrase "Son of Man" be corrected when translating only the New Testament, or also when translating the Old Testament? - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 11:28, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
323

edits