Difference between revisions of "User talk:AugustO"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Useful links
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Your comment did not contribute anything to the discussion at hand. You did not raise any new objections, but merely repeated previous ones. Your previous objections to the translation Mr. Schlafly proposed have already noted by him. Furthermore, that section of the talk page was not so much about whether or not that translation is correct, but about where and how to implement it. Your comment did not belong at that section of the talk page. I don't want to sound adversarial, but this is exactly the kind of [[last wordism]] and [[talk pollution]] that's so common at other wikis; Conservapedia seeks to minimize those phenomenons to a zero - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 14:47, 30 June 2014 (EDT) | Your comment did not contribute anything to the discussion at hand. You did not raise any new objections, but merely repeated previous ones. Your previous objections to the translation Mr. Schlafly proposed have already noted by him. Furthermore, that section of the talk page was not so much about whether or not that translation is correct, but about where and how to implement it. Your comment did not belong at that section of the talk page. I don't want to sound adversarial, but this is exactly the kind of [[last wordism]] and [[talk pollution]] that's so common at other wikis; Conservapedia seeks to minimize those phenomenons to a zero - [[User:PetyrB|PetyrB]] 14:47, 30 June 2014 (EDT) | ||
| + | :[[User talk:Aschlafly#Meritocracy|FYI]] --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:31, 1 July 2014 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:31, July 1, 2014
About my revert of your recent edits
Your comment did not contribute anything to the discussion at hand. You did not raise any new objections, but merely repeated previous ones. Your previous objections to the translation Mr. Schlafly proposed have already noted by him. Furthermore, that section of the talk page was not so much about whether or not that translation is correct, but about where and how to implement it. Your comment did not belong at that section of the talk page. I don't want to sound adversarial, but this is exactly the kind of last wordism and talk pollution that's so common at other wikis; Conservapedia seeks to minimize those phenomenons to a zero - PetyrB 14:47, 30 June 2014 (EDT)