Difference between revisions of "Talk:Richard Dawkins and pseudoscience"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Thanks, | Thanks, | ||
Jono. | Jono. | ||
| − | :I endeavor to pick pictures which best capture the essence of the person. The | + | :I endeavor to pick pictures which best capture the essence of the person. The [http://creation.com/was-dawkins-stumped-frog-to-a-prince-critics-refuted-again Richard Dawkins stumped picture] very well portrays the foolish/clueless nature of Richard Dawkins. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:11, 19 July 2014 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 06:13, July 19, 2014
Divorce and longevity: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/katie-hafner/divorces-surprising-effec_b_842892.html
Richard Dawkins Image
Hi guys,
I've noticed this on the page "Bias_in_wikipedia" where it reads: "For liberal politicians, Wikipedia uses flattering photos. But for conservative politician Sally Kern, about whom homosexual activists have had a sissy fit, from 2009 to 2011, Wikipedia used an absurd, uncharacteristic photo."
I have also noticed that the picture of Richard is also rather uncharacteristic. I agree with the information about Richard Dawkins, and dislike him myself, but think that in order to avoid being accused of hypocrisy, it would be best to find a more professional image of Mr Dawkins.
Thanks, Jono.
- I endeavor to pick pictures which best capture the essence of the person. The Richard Dawkins stumped picture very well portrays the foolish/clueless nature of Richard Dawkins. Conservative 02:11, 19 July 2014 (EDT)