Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
5 bytes removed ,  02:54, July 20, 2014
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
How can you get rid of an editor you just don't like on  Wikipedia? Team Harassment has it down to a science. Bullies will harass the victim until he reacts. Then they use his reaction as the basis for a complaint to Administrator's Noticeboard/Incidents (ANI). Established liberal editors rarely get sanctioned for harassing a conservative, the situation has to be resolved somehow, so the result is often a "topic ban" for the conservative. At this point, Team Harassment smells blood, and more people get involved. They accuse the victim of violating the topic ban. He generally has to stop editing for an extended period, and he may even be banned altogether. If he doesn't fall for any of these gags, the matter can always be referred to a trollocratic clique of senior admins who act as feminist enforcers. This clique has extraordinary powers that are not documented anywhere in the guidelines, at least as far as I am aware. They hand out extended blocks without prior warning, make up their own rules, and skip ANI.
+
How can you get rid of an editor you don't like on  Wikipedia? Team Harassment has it down to a science. Bullies will harass the victim until he reacts. Then they use his reaction as the basis for a complaint to Administrator's Noticeboard/Incidents (ANI). Established liberal editors rarely get sanctioned for harassing a conservative, the situation has to be resolved somehow, so the result is often a "topic ban" for the conservative. At this point, Team Harassment smells blood, and more people get involved. They accuse the victim of violating the topic ban. He generally has to stop editing for an extended period, and he may even be banned altogether. If he doesn't fall for any of these gags, the matter can always be referred to a trollocratic clique of senior admins who act as feminist enforcers. This clique has extraordinary powers that are not documented anywhere in the guidelines, at least as far as I am aware. They hand out extended blocks without prior warning, make up their own rules, and skip ANI.
    
Bullying is part of how the Internet works, and Wikipedia's guidelines make it clear that users have no right to due process. After all, it's not their job to give every troll and vandal a fair shake. All the same, with eight years experience and 33,000 edits, I feel I am entitled to something more than a "'Shut up,' he explained" and a form letter from Arbcom. (I'm "Kauffner" on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits this list].) It's not like one day I decided to go on a rule-breaking rampage. I kept doing my thing while old editors who had been my friends moved on, new editors with chips on their shoulders arrived, and Arbcom adjusted various policies.
 
Bullying is part of how the Internet works, and Wikipedia's guidelines make it clear that users have no right to due process. After all, it's not their job to give every troll and vandal a fair shake. All the same, with eight years experience and 33,000 edits, I feel I am entitled to something more than a "'Shut up,' he explained" and a form letter from Arbcom. (I'm "Kauffner" on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits this list].) It's not like one day I decided to go on a rule-breaking rampage. I kept doing my thing while old editors who had been my friends moved on, new editors with chips on their shoulders arrived, and Arbcom adjusted various policies.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
14,282

edits

Navigation menu