Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Category)
(+1)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
*[http://consumerist.com/2007/07/23/are-aribitrators-punished-by-credit-card-companies-for-ruling-in-favor-of-the-consumer/ "Are Aribitrators <nowiki>[</nowiki>''sic''<nowiki>]</nowiki> Punished By Credit Card Companies For Ruling In Favor Of The Consumer?"]
 
*[http://consumerist.com/2007/07/23/are-aribitrators-punished-by-credit-card-companies-for-ruling-in-favor-of-the-consumer/ "Are Aribitrators <nowiki>[</nowiki>''sic''<nowiki>]</nowiki> Punished By Credit Card Companies For Ruling In Favor Of The Consumer?"]
 
*"Did Obama set up an 'Constitution-exemption zone' within 100 miles of the U.S./Mexican border?"
 
*"Did Obama set up an 'Constitution-exemption zone' within 100 miles of the U.S./Mexican border?"
−
 
+
*"Tech entrepreneurs have greater impact on nation than the last two presidents combined?"
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}
  
 
[[Category:Journalism]]
 
[[Category:Journalism]]

Revision as of 21:53, August 10, 2014

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References