Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+1)
(+2 possible examples)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
*"Did Obama set up an 'Constitution-exemption zone' within 100 miles of the U.S./Mexican border?"
 
*"Did Obama set up an 'Constitution-exemption zone' within 100 miles of the U.S./Mexican border?"
 
*"Tech entrepreneurs have greater impact on nation than the last two presidents combined?"
 
*"Tech entrepreneurs have greater impact on nation than the last two presidents combined?"
 +
*[http://veritasnews.com/forced-arbitration-the-end-of-class-action/ "Forced Arbitration: The End of Class Action?"]
 +
*[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2014/08/28/accountability/executive/jihad-obama-recruiter/ "Jihad: Obama a Recruiter?"]
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}
  
 
[[Category:Journalism]]
 
[[Category:Journalism]]

Revision as of 04:33, September 6, 2014

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References