Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+2 possible examples)
(+1)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
*[http://veritasnews.com/forced-arbitration-the-end-of-class-action/ "Forced Arbitration: The End of Class Action?"]
 
*[http://veritasnews.com/forced-arbitration-the-end-of-class-action/ "Forced Arbitration: The End of Class Action?"]
 
*[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2014/08/28/accountability/executive/jihad-obama-recruiter/ "Jihad: Obama a Recruiter?"]
 
*[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2014/08/28/accountability/executive/jihad-obama-recruiter/ "Jihad: Obama a Recruiter?"]
 +
*[http://veritasnews.com/did-american-arbitration-association-arbitrator-have-a-conflict-of-interest/ "Did American Arbitration Association arbitrator have a conflict-of-interest?"]
 +
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}
  
 
[[Category:Journalism]]
 
[[Category:Journalism]]

Revision as of 00:35, September 20, 2014

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References