Difference between revisions of "Theory and practice"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (see also)
(Would someone please give this page some TLC?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{rewrite|It is nothing but a couple of random quotes from the Internet.  Granted, the quotes (well, the second one) are very good, but they need to find a better home than a page that doesn't relate them to anything.  Can someone figure out what do do with these?  Put them in the Philosophy page?  Leave them here but flesh out this page with a whole lot more information about what we are trying to say?  I don't really have any good ideas.}}
 +
 
* Theoretical understanding without practice is not sufficient ... [http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/intro.html]
 
* Theoretical understanding without practice is not sufficient ... [http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/intro.html]
  

Revision as of 00:09, September 22, 2014

This article or section needs to be rewritten, because:
It is nothing but a couple of random quotes from the Internet. Granted, the quotes (well, the second one) are very good, but they need to find a better home than a page that doesn't relate them to anything. Can someone figure out what do do with these? Put them in the Philosophy page? Leave them here but flesh out this page with a whole lot more information about what we are trying to say? I don't really have any good ideas.. (Discuss)
  • Theoretical understanding without practice is not sufficient ... [1]
  • Chess has an advantage over most school subjects: it combines both theory and practice. Ideas are honed and tested in the crucible of competitive play. Poor formulation or poor execution of ideas loses games. Careless, faulty thinking is ruthlessly refuted on the chessboard. [2]

See also: