Difference between revisions of "Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Bahnsen.jpg|thumb|250px|Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as "the man [[atheism|atheists]] fear most" due to [[Michael Martin]]'s [[Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate|cancellation]] of their scheduled debate.<ref>[http://simpleapologetics.com/thegreatdebate.html The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein]</ref>]] | [[Image:Bahnsen.jpg|thumb|250px|Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as "the man [[atheism|atheists]] fear most" due to [[Michael Martin]]'s [[Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate|cancellation]] of their scheduled debate.<ref>[http://simpleapologetics.com/thegreatdebate.html The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein]</ref>]] | ||
| − | '''Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God''' is an argument developed by Michael Martin, in which he claims logic, morality, and science, are incompatible with Christianity, it has been countered and criticized by several scholars. See also: [[Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate]] | + | '''Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God''' is an argument developed by [[Michael Martin]], in which he claims logic, morality, and science, are incompatible with Christianity, it has been countered and criticized by several scholars. See also: [[Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate]] |
It was made to counter the much older [[Transcendental argument for the existence of God]]. | It was made to counter the much older [[Transcendental argument for the existence of God]]. | ||
Revision as of 18:55, October 6, 2014
Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as "the man atheists fear most" due to Michael Martin's cancellation of their scheduled debate.[1]
Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God is an argument developed by Michael Martin, in which he claims logic, morality, and science, are incompatible with Christianity, it has been countered and criticized by several scholars. See also: Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate
It was made to counter the much older Transcendental argument for the existence of God.
Martin released his TANG argument in 1996 after Greg Bahnsen died in 1995.
Contents
See also
External links
Transcendental argument for the existence of God
See also: Transcendental argument for the existence of God and Atheism is irrational
- What is the transcendental argument for the existence of God?
- Responses to Atheist Philosopher, Michael Martin
- Naturalism Defeated A recent transcendental argument by Alvin Plantinga.
- Derrida, Van Til and the Metaphysics of Postmodernism An appraisal of Postmodernism, specifically Deconstruction, in light of Van Til by Jacob Gabriel Hale.
- The Transcendental Argument for God's Existence by Michael Butler.
- The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God by Matt Slick.
Debates on the transcendental argument for the existence of God
- "The Great Debate: Does God Exist?" or The Great Debate: Does God Exist? (YouTube video) - Dr. Greg Bahnsen versus Dr. Gordon Stein - Audio of a formal debate between Christian Greg Bahnsen and skeptic Gordon Stein at the University of California, Irvine.
- The Martin-Frame Debate A written debate between skeptic Michael Martin and Christian John Frame on the transcendental argument for the existence of God.
- "Is Non-Christian Thought Futile?" A written debate between Christian Doug Jones and skeptics Keith Parsons and Michael Martin in Antithesis magazine (vol. 2, no. 4).
