Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+1)
(+1)
Line 31: Line 31:
 
*[http://www.wdtv.com/wdtv.cfm?func=view&section=5-News&item=Could-You-Be-Charged-For-Taking-Photos-Of-National-Forests-18430 "Could You Be Charged For Taking Photos Of National Forests?"]
 
*[http://www.wdtv.com/wdtv.cfm?func=view&section=5-News&item=Could-You-Be-Charged-For-Taking-Photos-Of-National-Forests-18430 "Could You Be Charged For Taking Photos Of National Forests?"]
 
*[http://www.teapartycrusaders.com/u-s-politics/non-citizens-decide-november-election/ "Could non-citizens decide the November election?"]
 
*[http://www.teapartycrusaders.com/u-s-politics/non-citizens-decide-november-election/ "Could non-citizens decide the November election?"]
−
 
+
*[http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/11/did-the-gop-use-twitter-to-break-campaign-finance-law/ "Did the GOP use Twitter to break campaign finance law?"]
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}
  
 
[[Category:Journalism]]
 
[[Category:Journalism]]

Revision as of 00:51, November 18, 2014

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References