SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,592
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 12:22, December 7, 2014
, 12:22, December 7, 2014→Popular articles at Conservapedia: response
I would also suggest that any listing of our "most insightful articles" be pruned more carefully than the present list. One interloper that comes to mind is the [[Essay:Comedy_and_satires_concerning_atheism_and_evolution|Humor about atheism and evolution]] page. It is absurd, and gives all of us a bad name. It has pictures of a pony, a bear, and a "flying kitty". That may have been funny once, but it has long outlived its humor value. Furthermore, '''it is locked'''. A page that is locked '''can't possibly be considered "the best of the public"!''' Now some pages are admittedly vandalism magnets, but I think people are overreacting. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:45, 28 November 2014 (EST)
I would also suggest that any listing of our "most insightful articles" be pruned more carefully than the present list. One interloper that comes to mind is the [[Essay:Comedy_and_satires_concerning_atheism_and_evolution|Humor about atheism and evolution]] page. It is absurd, and gives all of us a bad name. It has pictures of a pony, a bear, and a "flying kitty". That may have been funny once, but it has long outlived its humor value. Furthermore, '''it is locked'''. A page that is locked '''can't possibly be considered "the best of the public"!''' Now some pages are admittedly vandalism magnets, but I think people are overreacting. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:45, 28 November 2014 (EST)
:SamHB, what are your thoughts related to the social science data contained in this article: [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:05, 29 November 2014 (EST)
:SamHB, what are your thoughts related to the social science data contained in this article: [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:05, 29 November 2014 (EST)
Thank you for your thoughtful responses. In order for the list to be effective, two changes should be made: 1) the list should be shortened to 10 or at most 25 itmes. 2) There should be an objective criteria for inclusion on the list. It should not be up to one or two people to curate the list based on which articles they find most interesting or which they have written. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 07:22, 7 December 2014 (EST)
==Subject Matter Experts==
==Subject Matter Experts==