Difference between revisions of "MSSA v. Holder"
From Conservapedia
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Legislation similar to the MFFA has become law in [[Tennessee]], and has been introduced in [[Alaska]], [[Texas]], [[Florida]], [[South Carolina]], [[Minnesota]], [[Michigan]], [[Pennsylvania]] and [[Ohio]]. | Legislation similar to the MFFA has become law in [[Tennessee]], and has been introduced in [[Alaska]], [[Texas]], [[Florida]], [[South Carolina]], [[Minnesota]], [[Michigan]], [[Pennsylvania]] and [[Ohio]]. | ||
| − | This is part of a national movement to assert [[states rights]] in favor of the basic [[unalienable right|unalienable rights]] of [[self-defense]] and [[home security]].<ref>http://FirearmsFreedomAct.com</ref> | + | This is part of a national movement to assert [[states' rights]] in favor of the basic [[unalienable right|unalienable rights]] of [[self-defense]] and [[home security]].<ref>http://FirearmsFreedomAct.com</ref> |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 14:10, January 3, 2015
In MSSA v. Holder, the Montana Shooting Sports Association (MSSA) and the Second Amendment Foundation are suing in federal court to obtain a ruling in favor of the Montana Firearms Freedom Act (MFFA), which the Montana Legislature passed in 2009.[1]
Legislation similar to the MFFA has become law in Tennessee, and has been introduced in Alaska, Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Ohio.
This is part of a national movement to assert states' rights in favor of the basic unalienable rights of self-defense and home security.[2]
