Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Medical Notice"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Wschact 01:05, 5 January 2015 (EST) | Wschact 01:05, 5 January 2015 (EST) | ||
| − | In response to his recommendation, I have modified the Disclaimer to be more generic. I | + | In response to his recommendation, I have modified the Disclaimer to be more generic. I have now linked clearly to the official CP legal disclaimer ([[Conservapedia:General_disclaimer]]). Please feel free to edit the template. But I do think we need a specific medical disclaimer template like the rough draft one I created. |
[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 07:37, 5 January 2015 (EST) | [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 07:37, 5 January 2015 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:00, January 5, 2015
Wise Comments from Wschact
I, User:TheAmericanRedoubt am quoting what User:Wschact wisely brought up on 01:05, 5 January 2015 (EST) at Conservapedia:Community_Portal. Here is the quote:
Template:Medical Notice - "unlike our general legal disclaimer, TAR's wording implicitly promises that CP articles will be reviewed by experts in the future and that CP will implement a certification program to show which articles have past a review. It implies that a nurse or herbalist have as much expertise as a doctor. A lot more discussion and review should occur before this template is put into article space. TAR has already deployed it at: Medication, Category:Food as Medicine, Ocimum sanctum, Withania somnifera, Embilica officinalis, and Tinospora cordifolia." Wschact 01:05, 5 January 2015 (EST)
In response to his recommendation, I have modified the Disclaimer to be more generic. I have now linked clearly to the official CP legal disclaimer (Conservapedia:General_disclaimer). Please feel free to edit the template. But I do think we need a specific medical disclaimer template like the rough draft one I created. TheAmericanRedoubt 07:37, 5 January 2015 (EST)