Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sanskrit"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by TheAmericanRedoubt (talk) to last revision by AlanE)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
:Thinking of my mate Gustav has started me thinking. (I do that occasionally). But to family time now and more in the morning.[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 03:07, 10 January 2015 (EST)
 
:Thinking of my mate Gustav has started me thinking. (I do that occasionally). But to family time now and more in the morning.[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 03:07, 10 January 2015 (EST)
−
 
−
:: I like The Planets. Thanks for that, I listened to it twice as I edit. It was wonderful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHVsszW7Nds
 
−
 
−
----
 
−
 
−
== Can Only Work on Indian Philosophy / Buddhist / Hindu Articles with [[User:Wschact]] on my Tail==
 
−
 
−
I have been a big advocate for the representing the [[Preparedness|Prepper]], [[:Category:Firearm]]s, [[Second Amendment|RKBA]], [[Alternative medicine]]/[[Ayurveda]] point of view on CP and improve those articles here, but my Conservative point-of-view changes won't last long with [[User:Wschact]] hounding me. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 06:42, 11 January 2015 (EST)
 
−
 
−
== Kind Advice from Conservative and Karajou and my Response - No more Survivalism-Guns-AltMed-Permaculture-HamRadio, just Indian Philosophy articles from me now==
 
−
 
−
If Wschact acts unreasonably in order to protect liberal sacred cows or acts in a petty way due to you adding conservative content that he does not like, please contact User: Karajou and/or User: JPatt.  On the other hand, please be judicious about this matter. If Wschact offers useful input, please take it.
 
−
 
−
I did solve the SamHB issue for you though. Should SamHB return, I suspect he will be far less truculent due to it being pointed out that masses of people are leaving his unfree state of Massachusetts each year. Obviously, people leave a sinking unfree ship of state and not a successful freedom loving flagship state. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:20, 11 January 2015 (EST)
 
−
::By the way, don't ever get frustrated and quit. Stand your ground and if necessary call in the cavalry of Karajou and Jpatt. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:26, 11 January 2015 (EST)
 
−
:::I reopened my user talk page mailbox. However, please please contact Karajou/Jpatt first as they may be more active than me at CP in the foreseeable future. I did make some promises to people to assist them with off wiki projects so Karajou/JPatt may act more quickly for you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:36, 11 January 2015 (EST)
 
−
 
−
:: Sorry fellow Conservatives, but Wschact (and all the really vociferous "libs"/RINOS here) finally won with their bullying. Washact and the five others, but especially Washact, have tired me out, calling me a parodist, a hijacker, etc, etc. The ''''only'''' thing Wshact didn't immediately edit are my Buddhist and Indian philosophy article contributions [[:Category:Indian Philosophy]] and [[:Category:Buddhism]]. It's simply too much of an uphill battle here with these loud-mouthed five, especially wshact. It's just too demoralizing even for an energetic contributor like me. As long as he is hounding me on ''''every'''' edit and template, it's just not worth it to me.
 
−
 
−
:: I can contribute my time and high energy elsewhere for the Conservative cause, where there is a slightly longer "pérennité" (as the French say) / durability to my contributions. I am sad to say my similar veined edits actually stayed visible on Wikipedia much longer before the vultures swooped in than they did here. At least over at Wikipedia I can contribute complementary medicine/herbology material without having it immediately deleted/reverted. Numerous items I contributed at Wikipedia lasted sometimes for weeks at a time, not just a few minutes or hours before deletion/reverting. And they usually put up a top of the page Admin template flag on it first for a couple days to weeks rather than just remove/revert it instantly like weshact is doing.
 
−
 
−
:: I think I will return back to the Conservative/Preparedness Forums from which I came. From now on you will only see on CP the occasional Buddhist, Hindu, Indian philosophy article I may perhaps continue to contribute since Comparative Religions/Philosophy was one of my past formal study areas in college.
 
−
 
−
: I sent you Karajou and User:Conservative a private e-mail about it.
 
−
 
−
::Be strong. Be of good courage. God bless America. Long live the Republic.
 
−
[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 05:50, 11 January 2015 (EST)
 

Latest revision as of 14:43, January 11, 2015

Sanskrit is not related to Basque. Who wrote this?

Sanskrit not Sanskirt

Sanskrit is among the greats as languages- a classical language from which many have been derived

TAR, You're right. I didn't read the article properly. My bad. AlanE 02:22, 10 January 2015 (EST)
No worries, your comment helped me improve the Sanskrit article I was going to get to in a few weeks. Over time, you will see more clearly why I added certain articles to certain existing categories. I have a lot to contribute in these areas. In the case of Sanskrit, practicing Ayurveda for so long and having studied it in India is why I can read Devanagari script and know about 1000 words of Sanskrit. Good day. TheAmericanRedoubt 02:41, 10 January 2015 (EST)
Then you would appreciate Holst. AlanE 02:51, 10 January 2015 (EST)
Thinking of my mate Gustav has started me thinking. (I do that occasionally). But to family time now and more in the morning.AlanE 03:07, 10 January 2015 (EST)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Sanskrit&oldid=1131117"