Difference between revisions of "Empirical science"
m (Reverted edits by TheAmericanRedoubt (talk) to last revision by AK) |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
*[[Origin science]] | *[[Origin science]] | ||
*[[Paleoscience]] | *[[Paleoscience]] | ||
| − | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
| − | {{Reflist}} | + | {{Reflist}} |
| − | |||
[[category:science]] | [[category:science]] | ||
[[category:scientific disciplines]] | [[category:scientific disciplines]] | ||
[[category:Methodology of Science]] | [[category:Methodology of Science]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 20:40, February 2, 2015
Empirical science is based on the scientific method that requires from the scientist to test a theory based on observed or predicted facts. The scientist must formulate a theory or a hypothesis based on what has been observed, then design a test by which the theory may be verified as valid or not.[1] Knowledge and data acquired in empirical science is based entirely on experience and repeatable observations. Modern science has empiricism as its philosophical foundation. If adherents of a theory or hypothesis continue believing it due to their worldview despite it cannot survive a confrontation with experience, then such attitude is usually referred to as faith in doctrinal commitment. For example, a faith in planned economy or in junk DNA have been proposed to fall into such category.[2][3]
See also
References
- ↑ Empirical Science Is Observable. the Institute for Creation Research.
- ↑ David Berlinski (2009). "Has Darwin met his match?", The Deniable Darwin. Seattle, USA: Discovery Institute Press (reprinted from Commentary February 1998 by permission), 308. ISBN 978-0-9790141-2-3.
- ↑ Jonathan Wells (2011). The Myth of Junk DNA. Discovery Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-9365990-0-4.