Difference between revisions of "Talk:Seung-Hui Cho"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (formatting)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
::::Look at the source the article cites. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 20:02, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::::Look at the source the article cites. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 20:02, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Either way, a redirect can be set up. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:56, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Either way, a redirect can be set up. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:56, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==32 fellow students?==
 +
 +
I think at least one of the casualties was a professor, if not more. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:06, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:06, April 18, 2007

We should probably mention (somewhere) that Chinese, Japanese and Korean names go in [family, given] order. So that "Mr. Cho" is would be called Seung-Hui by his parents or close friends (not this this kid had any close friends, but ...) --Ed Poor 19:50, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

For the purposes of the article, I believe the (first, last) combination will be searched much more, and as the Anglicized version, can stand to stay on Conservapedia. I don't have a grasp of east Asian languages, though. --Hojimachongtalk 19:53, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
I think it should go back to Seung-Hui Cho, given that the source cited, and most of the news, calls him that. ColinRtalk 19:55, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
What news are you looking at, Colin? I've only seen Cho Seung-Hui on CNN, ABC, MSNBC, and the Today show :/. --Hojimachongtalk 19:56, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
Look at the source the article cites. ColinRtalk 20:02, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Either way, a redirect can be set up. DanH 19:56, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

32 fellow students?

I think at least one of the casualties was a professor, if not more. DanH 20:06, 17 April 2007 (EDT)