Difference between revisions of "Atheism and reason"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
*[http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2008/08/naturalisms-hot.html Naturalism's Hot Water]
 
*[http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2008/08/naturalisms-hot.html Naturalism's Hot Water]
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
 +
 +
== C.S. Lewis's argument for reason and for the irrationality of materialism ==
 +
 +
*[http://creationevolutiondesign.blogspot.com/2006/09/cs-lewis-argument-from-reason.html C.S. Lewis' argument from reason]
 +
*[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/11/cs_lewis_and_th079541.html C.S. Lewis and the Argument from Reason] by Jay W. Richards, November 25, 2013
 +
*[http://www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-6-number-6/cs-lewis-and-materialism C.S. Lewis and Materialism] by John G. West
 +
*[http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=8669 C.S. Lewis On The Validity of Reasoning]
 +
*[http://truthbomb.blogspot.com/2012/04/cs-lewis-on-rationality-and-materialism.html C.S. Lewis on Rationality and Materialism ]
 +
*[http://fidedubitandum.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/atheism-and-the-inability-to-think/ Atheism and the Inability to Think]
 +
*[http://www.apologetics315.com/2012/11/book-review-cs-lewiss-dangerous-idea-in.html Book Review: C.S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason by Victor Reppert]
 +
<br />
 +
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
  
 
*[[Atheism and irrationality]]
 
*[[Atheism and irrationality]]

Revision as of 20:40, May 28, 2015

Atheism/naturalism and reason are incompatible and believing in naturalism is therefore self-defeating. In short, if naturalism is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. [1]

C.S. Lewis's argument for reason and for the irrationality of materialism



See also

  1. ↑
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism_and_reason&oldid=1155855"