Difference between revisions of "Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc²"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Andy, please take a shot at E=mc^2#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton! --~~~~") |
(Broken clocks are right twice a day, and chance occurrences cannot remedy logical flaws.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Andy, please take a shot at [[E=mc^2#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:29, 14 June 2015 (EDT) | Andy, please take a shot at [[E=mc^2#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:29, 14 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :August, you overrely on one outdated experiment that was not even honored for proving E=mc<sup>2</sup>. Even if your somewhat novel view of the significance of the experiment were correct, the formula would still have to comply with logic. Broken clocks are right twice a day, and chance occurrences cannot remedy logical flaws.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:41, 14 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:41, June 14, 2015
Andy, please take a shot at E=mc^2#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton! --AugustO 14:29, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
- August, you overrely on one outdated experiment that was not even honored for proving E=mc2. Even if your somewhat novel view of the significance of the experiment were correct, the formula would still have to comply with logic. Broken clocks are right twice a day, and chance occurrences cannot remedy logical flaws.--Andy Schlafly 14:41, 14 June 2015 (EDT)