Difference between revisions of "Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc²"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(elaborate) |
(o you really think that one experiment from long ago "proved" the formula as a fundamental law of nature? What if the speed of light changes?) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::*Everyone who has studied physics as a certain level knows of this experiment. If you wish to convince someone of your "novel view" (more accurate use of this phrase), you should be able to answer this questions and point out your interpretation! | ::*Everyone who has studied physics as a certain level knows of this experiment. If you wish to convince someone of your "novel view" (more accurate use of this phrase), you should be able to answer this questions and point out your interpretation! | ||
::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:45, 14 June 2015 (EDT) | ::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:45, 14 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::You didn't respond to my points about logic. Also, the [[Nobel Prize]] Committee did not claim that the experiment "proved" that E=mc<sup>2</sup>. Do you really think that one experiment from long ago "proved" the formula as a fundamental law of nature? What if the speed of light changes?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:41, 14 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:41, June 14, 2015
Andy, please take a shot at Talk:E=mc²#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton! --AugustO 14:29, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
- August, you overrely on one outdated experiment that was not even honored for proving E=mc2. Even if your somewhat novel view of the significance of the experiment were correct, the formula would still have to comply with logic. Broken clocks are right twice a day, and chance occurrences cannot remedy logical flaws.--Andy Schlafly 14:41, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
- This experiment has been repeated thousands of times, it is done in many physics courses at colleges and universities as it provides an easy understanding of this subject. Therefore, it should be approachable to you. So, quit stalling, and answer the questions, please!
- Everyone who has studied physics as a certain level knows of this experiment. If you wish to convince someone of your "novel view" (more accurate use of this phrase), you should be able to answer this questions and point out your interpretation!
- --AugustO 14:45, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
- You didn't respond to my points about logic. Also, the Nobel Prize Committee did not claim that the experiment "proved" that E=mc2. Do you really think that one experiment from long ago "proved" the formula as a fundamental law of nature? What if the speed of light changes?--Andy Schlafly 15:41, 14 June 2015 (EDT)