Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+1)
(+1)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
*[http://spectator.org/articles/62987/can-king-v-burwell-revive-economy "Can King v. Burwell Revive the Economy?"]
 
*[http://spectator.org/articles/62987/can-king-v-burwell-revive-economy "Can King v. Burwell Revive the Economy?"]
 
*"Dylann Storm killed 9 people in a church. Like many atheists, he was a loner. Was he an atheist?"
 
*"Dylann Storm killed 9 people in a church. Like many atheists, he was a loner. Was he an atheist?"
 +
*"Was Dylann Roof an atheist?"
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 01:35, June 25, 2015

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References