Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+1)
(+1)
Line 39: Line 39:
 
*"Was Dylann Roof an atheist?"
 
*"Was Dylann Roof an atheist?"
 
*[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2015/06/21/editorial/uncategorized/rogue-court/ "Rogue Court?"]--the first sentence of the article asks "Has the United States Supreme Court turned completely into a rogue court?"
 
*[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2015/06/21/editorial/uncategorized/rogue-court/ "Rogue Court?"]--the first sentence of the article asks "Has the United States Supreme Court turned completely into a rogue court?"
−
 
+
*[http://voterintegrityproject.com/hiding-non-citz-voters/ "Is HB 328 the “Non-Citizen Voter Protection Act”?!"]
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}
  
 
[[Category:Journalism]]
 
[[Category:Journalism]]

Revision as of 14:11, July 1, 2015

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References