Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+1)
(+1)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
*[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2015/06/21/editorial/uncategorized/rogue-court/ "Rogue Court?"]--the first sentence of the article asks "Has the United States Supreme Court turned completely into a rogue court?"
 
*[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2015/06/21/editorial/uncategorized/rogue-court/ "Rogue Court?"]--the first sentence of the article asks "Has the United States Supreme Court turned completely into a rogue court?"
 
*[http://voterintegrityproject.com/hiding-non-citz-voters/ "Is HB 328 the “Non-Citizen Voter Protection Act”?!"]
 
*[http://voterintegrityproject.com/hiding-non-citz-voters/ "Is HB 328 the “Non-Citizen Voter Protection Act”?!"]
 +
*[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/07/04/is-texas-plan-to-bring-home-its-stockpile-of-gold-bars-a-step-toward-secession/ "Is Texas’ Plan to Bring Home Its Stockpile of Gold Bars a Step Toward Secession?"]
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}
  
 
[[Category:Journalism]]
 
[[Category:Journalism]]

Revision as of 20:37, July 4, 2015

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References