Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 34: Line 34:
 
*[http://voterintegrityproject.com/hiding-non-citz-voters/ "Is HB 328 the “Non-Citizen Voter Protection Act”?!"]
 
*[http://voterintegrityproject.com/hiding-non-citz-voters/ "Is HB 328 the “Non-Citizen Voter Protection Act”?!"]
 
*[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/07/04/is-texas-plan-to-bring-home-its-stockpile-of-gold-bars-a-step-toward-secession/ "Is Texas’ Plan to Bring Home Its Stockpile of Gold Bars a Step Toward Secession?"]
 
*[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/07/04/is-texas-plan-to-bring-home-its-stockpile-of-gold-bars-a-step-toward-secession/ "Is Texas’ Plan to Bring Home Its Stockpile of Gold Bars a Step Toward Secession?"]
−
*"Will Obama try to push sodomy and abortion in Kenya?"
 
 
*[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3160894/Could-roads-PLASTIC-spell-end-potholes-Recycled-bottles-finally-end-scourge-motorist.html?ito=social-facebook "Could roads made from PLASTIC spell the end of potholes?"]
 
*[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3160894/Could-roads-PLASTIC-spell-end-potholes-Recycled-bottles-finally-end-scourge-motorist.html?ito=social-facebook "Could roads made from PLASTIC spell the end of potholes?"]
  

Revision as of 01:12, July 16, 2015

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References