Difference between revisions of "Corker law"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(improved)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The '''Corker Bill''' is a misguided federal law that circumvents the [[Treaty Clause]] in the [[U.S. Constitution]], and essentially requires not a 2/3rds vote to ratify a foreign treaty, but a 2/3rds vote to reject one (in order to override a presidential veto).
+
The '''Corker Law''', officially known as Bipartisan Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act and informally still called the "Corker bill," is a misguided federal law that circumvents the [[Treaty Clause]] in the [[U.S. Constitution]], and essentially requires not a 2/3rds vote to ratify a foreign treaty, but a 2/3rds vote to reject one (in order to override a presidential veto).
  
 
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach.
 
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach.

Revision as of 16:53, August 10, 2015

The Corker Law, officially known as Bipartisan Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act and informally still called the "Corker bill," is a misguided federal law that circumvents the Treaty Clause in the U.S. Constitution, and essentially requires not a 2/3rds vote to ratify a foreign treaty, but a 2/3rds vote to reject one (in order to override a presidential veto).

The U.S. Supreme Court has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach.