Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Link is still active.)
(add an example)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
*[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/07/04/is-texas-plan-to-bring-home-its-stockpile-of-gold-bars-a-step-toward-secession/ "Is Texas’ Plan to Bring Home Its Stockpile of Gold Bars a Step Toward Secession?"]
 
*[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/07/04/is-texas-plan-to-bring-home-its-stockpile-of-gold-bars-a-step-toward-secession/ "Is Texas’ Plan to Bring Home Its Stockpile of Gold Bars a Step Toward Secession?"]
 
*[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3160894/Could-roads-PLASTIC-spell-end-potholes-Recycled-bottles-finally-end-scourge-motorist.html?ito=social-facebook "Could roads made from PLASTIC spell the end of potholes?"]
 
*[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3160894/Could-roads-PLASTIC-spell-end-potholes-Recycled-bottles-finally-end-scourge-motorist.html?ito=social-facebook "Could roads made from PLASTIC spell the end of potholes?"]
−
 
+
*[http://fortune.com/2015/09/24/draftkings-fanduel-legal/ "Are DraftKings and FanDuel legal?"]
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}
  
 
[[Category:Journalism]]
 
[[Category:Journalism]]

Revision as of 00:27, October 12, 2015

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References