Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abc conjecture"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Categories: The formulation, although commonly reported as stated, seems slightly off - if all the numbers are positive, then of-course the ratio will be positive also.) |
(→square-free-part(abc) times (r/c): new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Thanks. The formulation, although commonly reported as stated, seems slightly off - if all the numbers are positive, then of-course the ratio will be positive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 16:11, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | Thanks. The formulation, although commonly reported as stated, seems slightly off - if all the numbers are positive, then of-course the ratio will be positive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 16:11, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == square-free-part(abc) times (r/c) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | "square-free-part(abc) times (r/c) " | ||
| + | |||
| + | That is wrong. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 16:14, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:14, October 23, 2015
Categories
Categories are capitalized. To avoid red links, one should write category:Number Theory instead of category:number theory. --AugustO (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
Thanks. The formulation, although commonly reported as stated, seems slightly off - if all the numbers are positive, then of-course the ratio will be positive also.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
square-free-part(abc) times (r/c)
"square-free-part(abc) times (r/c) "
That is wrong. --AugustO (talk) 16:14, 23 October 2015 (EDT)