Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abc conjecture"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→square-free-part(abc) times (r/c): new section) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Thanks. The formulation, although commonly reported as stated, seems slightly off - if all the numbers are positive, then of-course the ratio will be positive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 16:11, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | Thanks. The formulation, although commonly reported as stated, seems slightly off - if all the numbers are positive, then of-course the ratio will be positive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 16:11, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Sorry, but you are misstating the formula: it is not square-free-part(abc) x r /c... Please revisit your sources.--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 16:17, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
== square-free-part(abc) times (r/c) == | == square-free-part(abc) times (r/c) == | ||
Revision as of 20:17, October 23, 2015
Categories
Categories are capitalized. To avoid red links, one should write category:Number Theory instead of category:number theory. --AugustO (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
Thanks. The formulation, although commonly reported as stated, seems slightly off - if all the numbers are positive, then of-course the ratio will be positive also.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- Sorry, but you are misstating the formula: it is not square-free-part(abc) x r /c... Please revisit your sources.--AugustO (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
square-free-part(abc) times (r/c)
"square-free-part(abc) times (r/c) "
That is wrong. --AugustO (talk) 16:14, 23 October 2015 (EDT)