Difference between revisions of "Talk:Loch Ness Monster"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== This statement need attributions if it is true. I personally doubt there has been a survey == | == This statement need attributions if it is true. I personally doubt there has been a survey == | ||
| − | It is considered by most to be a legendary hoax. | + | It is considered by most to be a legendary hoax. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)conservative |
TWO WORDS: "Tree fiddy" --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 19:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | TWO WORDS: "Tree fiddy" --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 19:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:39, April 20, 2007
This statement need attributions if it is true. I personally doubt there has been a survey
It is considered by most to be a legendary hoax. Conservative 12:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
TWO WORDS: "Tree fiddy" --Crackertalk 19:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Article needs total re-work
This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that there really IS a creature. In desperate need of qualification and skepticism. Tmtoulouse 16:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Agreed. Nessie exists as much as Sasquatch or the Abominable Snowman From what I've seen/read, Nessie was a hoax from day one. --Lohengrin 16:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT)