Changes

76 bytes added ,  23:52, December 30, 2015
Line 50: Line 50:  
:Thanks for pointing it out.  I've added some info, and tried to make a bit of structure.  If I find more info, I'll try to come back and add it.  Of course, feel free to add to it as well, or reorganize.  Do you suppose we should try to get an admin to include a screenshot of the program? [[User:DavidB4|DavidB4]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 9:16, 29 December 2015 (EST)
 
:Thanks for pointing it out.  I've added some info, and tried to make a bit of structure.  If I find more info, I'll try to come back and add it.  Of course, feel free to add to it as well, or reorganize.  Do you suppose we should try to get an admin to include a screenshot of the program? [[User:DavidB4|DavidB4]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 9:16, 29 December 2015 (EST)
   −
== Thanks and some input ==
+
== Thanks and some input/feedback ==
    
Thanks for all your contributions. We very much appreciate having fellow conservatives involved in our project.  
 
Thanks for all your contributions. We very much appreciate having fellow conservatives involved in our project.  
   −
Second, make sure you add category tags to all your articles plus have another page or pages link to your new article. Otherwise, the articles will never be found or added to.  
+
Second, make sure you add category tags to all your articles plus have another page or pages link to your new article. Otherwise, the articles will never be found or added to. For example, add a category tag or tags to the [[bullet]] article.  
    
Next, as far as length of new articles, you want the articles to be like an encyclopedia in length as far as your new articles and not like a dictionary. A basic rule of thumb is to avoid stub articles.  You don't want to disappoint an encyclopedia reader with a stub article. It is better to create one encyclopedia length article than create many stub article.  And as as added bonus, you will get more people to read your content as non-stub articles are listed by the major search engines.  
 
Next, as far as length of new articles, you want the articles to be like an encyclopedia in length as far as your new articles and not like a dictionary. A basic rule of thumb is to avoid stub articles.  You don't want to disappoint an encyclopedia reader with a stub article. It is better to create one encyclopedia length article than create many stub article.  And as as added bonus, you will get more people to read your content as non-stub articles are listed by the major search engines.  
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,458

edits