Difference between revisions of "Pseudoscience"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
== Example of a field often classified as pseudoscience by conservatives ==
 
== Example of a field often classified as pseudoscience by conservatives ==
−
[[Theory of evolution]]<ref>http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/</ref><ref>http://www.grisda.org/origins/04004.htm</ref><ref>http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/there-is-no-theory-of-evolution/</ref> <ref>http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/PoE/pe05scnc.html</ref><ref>http://www.parentcompany.com/science_kit/sk3b.htm</ref>
+
[[Theory of evolution]]<ref>http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/</ref><ref>http://www.grisda.org/origins/04004.htm</ref><ref>http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/there-is-no-theory-of-evolution/</ref> <ref>http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/PoE/pe05scnc.html</ref><ref>http://www.parentcompany.com/science_kit/sk3b.htm</ref><ref>http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/reprints/Evolution-Fact-or-Theory.pdf</ref>
  
 
==Examples of fields often classified as pseudosciences by liberals==
 
==Examples of fields often classified as pseudosciences by liberals==

Revision as of 23:34, April 20, 2007

Pseudoscience is theory or speculation having the trappings of science, and presented as science, but not generally accepted as valid by the scientific community. The stated reasons for rejection usually relate to lack of observability, failure to follow the scientific method, be falsifiable, apparently lack of objectivity, or unwillingness to allow neutral outsiders to observe, test, or replicate findings.

For example, Uri Geller claims to be able to bend spoons without applying pressure to them, but he can't do it in front of scientists or journalists.


Examples of fields often classified as pseudosciences

Example of a field often classified as pseudoscience by conservatives

Theory of evolution[1][2][3] [4][5][6]

Examples of fields often classified as pseudosciences by liberals

References